TQQY vs. RDTY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

TQQY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF) and RDTY (YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TQQY is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while RDTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TQQY returned 14.27% vs 20.76% for RDTY. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TQQY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for RDTY.

Performance

TQQY vs. RDTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQY achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly lower than RDTY's 11.22% return.

TQQY

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 4.12%
• 6M: 1.60%
• 1Y: 14.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RDTY

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 11.22%
• 6M: 10.82%
• 1Y: 20.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQY vs. RDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF	4.12%	3.73%
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	11.22%	10.73%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQY and RDTY is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025	0.65

The correlation between TQQY and RDTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TQQY vs. RDTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQY

TQQY Risk / Return Rank: 21
TQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
TQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
TQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 25
TQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
TQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 18

RDTY

RDTY Risk / Return Rank: 42
RDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
RDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
RDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 35
RDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
RDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQY vs. RDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TQQY	RDTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	1.20	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	1.73	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.21	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	2.27	-1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.81	7.59	-5.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TQQY vs. RDTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQY Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the RDTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQY and RDTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TQQY	RDTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67	1.20	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.82	-0.86

Drawdowns

TQQY vs. RDTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQY drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, which is greater than RDTY's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQY and RDTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQQY	RDTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.31%	-17.31%	-8.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.35%	-9.20%	-10.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.98%	-2.78%	-4.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.59%	-2.74%	-6.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.90%	2.74%	+5.16%

Volatility

TQQY vs. RDTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) is 4.45%, while YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that TQQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TQQY	RDTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	6.65%	-2.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.24%	12.97%	+2.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.30%	17.34%	+3.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.04%	22.22%	+1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.04%	22.22%	+1.82%

TQQY vs. RDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than RDTY's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

TQQY vs. RDTY - Dividend Comparison

TQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 61.77%, more than RDTY's 44.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	44.39%	36.75%
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF	61.77%	49.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TQQY and RDTY in my portfolio?

TQQY and RDTY have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TQQY or RDTY?

RDTY has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to TQQY (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQY dropped -25.31% vs RDTY's -17.31%.

Which ETF is better, TQQY or RDTY?

On 1-year performance, RDTY leads with 20.76% vs 14.27% for TQQY. On fees, RDTY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TQQY has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TQQY or RDTY?

Over the 1-year period, RDTY has performed better with a 20.76% return vs 14.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TQQY or RDTY?

RDTY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TQQY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TQQY or RDTY?

TQQY has the higher dividend yield at 61.77%, compared with 44.39% for RDTY.

What is the main difference between TQQY and RDTY?

TQQY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RDTY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TQQY and 1.01% for RDTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.