PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQQ vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQQQ vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 47.28% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has outperformed XLK with an annualized return of 44.55%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively lower 25.19% annualized return.


TQQQ

1D
1.99%
1M
0.36%
YTD
47.28%
6M
47.23%
1Y
106.26%
3Y*
59.79%
5Y*
24.34%
10Y*
44.55%

XLK

1D
0.87%
1M
4.50%
YTD
28.52%
6M
28.96%
1Y
53.24%
3Y*
30.28%
5Y*
22.02%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
47.28%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.52%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and XLK is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.96

The correlation between TQQQ and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

TQQQ vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TQQQ
XLK

Technology

53.8%
99.7%

Communication Services

15.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%
0.1%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.6%
0.2%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

TQQQ
53.8%
XLK
99.7%

Communication Services

TQQQ
15.8%
XLK

-

Consumer Cyclical

TQQQ
12.3%
XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

TQQQ
7.7%
XLK

-

Healthcare

TQQQ
4.2%
XLK

-

Industrials

TQQQ
2.8%
XLK
0.1%

Utilities

TQQQ
1.4%
XLK

-

Basic Materials

TQQQ
1.1%
XLK

-

Energy

TQQQ
0.6%
XLK
0.2%

Financial Services

TQQQ
0.2%
XLK

-

Real Estate

TQQQ
0.1%
XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TQQQXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.36

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.26

10.85

-1.59

TQQQ vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQQ and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, roughly equal to the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQQXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.66%

-82.05%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.97%

-15.92%

-21.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

-25.66%

-32.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

-33.56%

-48.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

-33.56%

-48.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.12%

-6.77%

-4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.51%

-34.93%

+16.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.52%

4.92%

+6.60%

Volatility

TQQQ vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a higher volatility of 22.79% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 10.86%. This indicates that TQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQQQXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.79%

10.86%

+11.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.26%

18.92%

+22.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.24%

22.55%

+28.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.02%

25.18%

+41.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.22%

24.64%

+41.58%

TQQQ vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQQQ vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, which matches XLK's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.41%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.41%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, TQQQ and XLK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TQQQ has higher volatility (22.79%) compared to XLK (10.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.55% vs 25.19% for XLK. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 10.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.55% return vs 25.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ and XLK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.41%.

TQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQQ and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer