TQQQ vs. XAR
TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) and XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ returned 44.55%/yr vs 18.45%/yr for XAR. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAR.
Performance
TQQQ vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 47.28% return, which is significantly higher than XAR's 16.10% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has outperformed XAR with an annualized return of 44.55%, while XAR has yielded a comparatively lower 18.45% annualized return.
TQQQ
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 47.28%
- 6M
- 47.23%
- 1Y
- 114.36%
- 3Y*
- 59.79%
- 5Y*
- 24.34%
- 10Y*
- 44.55%
XAR
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 16.10%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 42.07%
- 3Y*
- 33.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.58%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
TQQQ vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 47.28% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 16.10% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between TQQQ and XAR is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.55 |
The correlation between TQQQ and XAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
TQQQ vs. XAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TQQQ
XAR
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
TQQQ
XAR
Communication Services
TQQQ
XAR
-
Consumer Cyclical
TQQQ
XAR
-
Consumer Defensive
TQQQ
XAR
-
Healthcare
TQQQ
XAR
-
Industrials
TQQQ
XAR
Utilities
TQQQ
XAR
-
Basic Materials
TQQQ
XAR
-
Energy
TQQQ
XAR
-
Financial Services
TQQQ
XAR
-
Real Estate
TQQQ
XAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TQQQ vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
TQQQ
XAR
TQQQ vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TQQQ | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 2.43 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.26 | 6.81 | +2.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TQQQ vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than XAR's maximum drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQQQ | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.66% | -46.37% | -35.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.97% | -17.22% | -19.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.04% | -19.73% | -38.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.66% | -32.40% | -49.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.66% | -46.37% | -35.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.12% | -4.32% | -6.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.51% | -6.78% | -11.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.52% | 6.13% | +5.39% |
Volatility
TQQQ vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a higher volatility of 22.79% compared to SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) at 11.46%. This indicates that TQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TQQQ | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.79% | 11.46% | +11.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.26% | 23.56% | +17.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.24% | 27.85% | +23.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.02% | 23.66% | +43.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.22% | 24.74% | +41.48% |
TQQQ vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TQQQ vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, more than XAR's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.41% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TQQQ and XAR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (22.79%) compared to XAR (11.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs XAR's -46.37%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.55% vs 18.45% for XAR. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XAR has been the lower-risk option at 11.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.55% return vs 18.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.
TQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XAR is Aerospace & Defense. TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 0.35% for XAR.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TQQQ and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer