PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQQ vs. PPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQQQ vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 38.79% return, which is significantly higher than PPA's 8.88% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has outperformed PPA with an annualized return of 42.84%, while PPA has yielded a comparatively lower 17.29% annualized return.


TQQQ

1D
-14.28%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
38.79%
6M
30.51%
1Y
98.25%
3Y*
60.11%
5Y*
24.09%
10Y*
42.84%

PPA

1D
-1.75%
1M
1.72%
YTD
8.88%
6M
13.17%
1Y
25.68%
3Y*
28.96%
5Y*
17.90%
10Y*
17.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
38.79%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
8.88%37.15%25.28%18.41%9.52%7.09%0.45%39.63%-7.51%30.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and PPA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.63

The correlation between TQQQ and PPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TQQQ vs. PPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TQQQ
PPA

Technology

53.8%
9.3%

Communication Services

15.8%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%
90.6%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

TQQQ
53.8%
PPA
9.3%

Communication Services

TQQQ
15.8%
PPA
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

TQQQ
12.3%
PPA

-

Consumer Defensive

TQQQ
7.7%
PPA

-

Healthcare

TQQQ
4.2%
PPA

-

Industrials

TQQQ
2.8%
PPA
90.6%

Utilities

TQQQ
1.4%
PPA

-

Basic Materials

TQQQ
1.1%
PPA

-

Energy

TQQQ
0.6%
PPA

-

Financial Services

TQQQ
0.2%
PPA
0.0%

Real Estate

TQQQ
0.1%
PPA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

PPA
PPA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQQQPPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

1.97

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

5.69

+3.51

TQQQ vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQQ and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQQQPPADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.40

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.97

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.84

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.66

+0.05

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than PPA's maximum drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and PPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQQPPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.66%

-57.37%

-24.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.97%

-13.71%

-23.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

-15.24%

-42.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

-18.37%

-63.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

-43.92%

-37.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.25%

-8.11%

-8.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-9.18%

-9.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.33%

4.73%

+6.60%

Volatility

TQQQ vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a higher volatility of 20.42% compared to Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) at 6.79%. This indicates that TQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQQQPPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.42%

6.79%

+13.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.33%

16.15%

+23.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.81%

19.21%

+30.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.79%

18.52%

+48.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.11%

20.65%

+45.46%

TQQQ vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PPA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQQQ vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, more than PPA's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.38%0.42%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.43%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


TQQQ and PPA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.42%) compared to PPA (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs PPA's -57.37%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 42.84% vs 17.29% for PPA. On fees, PPA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PPA has been the lower-risk option at 6.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 42.84% return vs 17.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PPA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.38% for PPA.

TQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 0.58% for PPA.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQQ and PPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer