TQQQ vs. MUU
TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TQQQ is passively managed, while MUU is actively managed. Over the past year, TQQQ returned 137.89% vs 6522.95% for MUU. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MUU.
Performance
TQQQ vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 64.46% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 961.23% return.
TQQQ
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 33.35%
- YTD
- 64.46%
- 6M
- 55.93%
- 1Y
- 137.89%
- 3Y*
- 69.49%
- 5Y*
- 28.37%
- 10Y*
- 45.33%
MUU
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- 218.90%
- YTD
- 961.23%
- 6M
- 1,422.01%
- 1Y
- 6,522.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 64.46% | 34.35% | 7.13% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 961.23% | 599.03% | -43.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between TQQQ and MUU is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between TQQQ and MUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TQQQ vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
TQQQ
MUU
TQQQ vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TQQQ | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -47.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.91 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 125.85 | -122.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | 426.84 | -414.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TQQQ | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 50.40 | -47.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 6.68 | -5.95 |
Drawdowns
TQQQ vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQQQ | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.66% | -75.07% | -6.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.97% | -52.72% | +15.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | 0.00% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -23.44% | +4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.28% | 15.51% | -4.23% |
Volatility
TQQQ vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) is 13.29%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 54.78%. This indicates that TQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TQQQ | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.29% | 54.78% | -41.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.04% | 105.07% | -69.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.60% | 131.77% | -84.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.53% | 133.67% | -67.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.96% | 133.67% | -67.71% |
TQQQ vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
TQQQ vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than MUU's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.46% | 4.27% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.36% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TQQQ and MUU have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUU has higher volatility (54.78%) compared to TQQQ (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs MUU's -75.07%.
On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 6522.95% vs 137.89% for TQQQ. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 6522.95% return vs 137.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MUU.
MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 1.06% for MUU.
MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (50.40 vs 2.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TQQQ and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer