TQQQ vs. JNUG
TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) and JNUG (Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%) while JNUG tracks the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ returned 44.55%/yr vs -26.31%/yr for JNUG. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for JNUG.
Performance
TQQQ vs. JNUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 47.28% return, which is significantly higher than JNUG's -32.23% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has outperformed JNUG with an annualized return of 44.55%, while JNUG has yielded a comparatively lower -26.31% annualized return.
TQQQ
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 47.28%
- 6M
- 47.23%
- 1Y
- 106.26%
- 3Y*
- 59.79%
- 5Y*
- 24.34%
- 10Y*
- 44.55%
JNUG
- 1D
- 6.13%
- 1M
- -37.63%
- YTD
- -32.23%
- 6M
- -30.59%
- 1Y
- 61.91%
- 3Y*
- 61.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- -26.31%
TQQQ vs. JNUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 47.28% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares | -32.23% | 478.59% | 9.96% | -4.79% | -43.60% | -46.61% | -85.51% | 82.43% | -48.11% | -20.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between TQQQ and JNUG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2013 | 0.15 |
Over the past year, TQQQ and JNUG have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.
TQQQ vs. JNUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TQQQ
JNUG
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
TQQQ
JNUG
-
Communication Services
TQQQ
JNUG
-
Consumer Cyclical
TQQQ
JNUG
-
Consumer Defensive
TQQQ
JNUG
-
Healthcare
TQQQ
JNUG
-
Industrials
TQQQ
JNUG
-
Utilities
TQQQ
JNUG
-
Basic Materials
TQQQ
JNUG
Energy
TQQQ
JNUG
-
Financial Services
TQQQ
JNUG
-
Real Estate
TQQQ
JNUG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TQQQ vs. JNUG — Risk / Return Rank
TQQQ
JNUG
TQQQ vs. JNUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TQQQ | JNUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.19 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 0.92 | +1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.26 | 2.26 | +7.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TQQQ vs. JNUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, smaller than the maximum JNUG drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and JNUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQQQ | JNUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.66% | -99.95% | +18.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.97% | -67.53% | +30.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.04% | -67.53% | +9.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.66% | -80.07% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.66% | -99.66% | +18.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.12% | -99.62% | +88.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.51% | -93.87% | +75.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.52% | 27.53% | -16.01% |
Volatility
TQQQ vs. JNUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) is 22.79%, while Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares (JNUG) has a volatility of 39.22%. This indicates that TQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TQQQ | JNUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.79% | 39.22% | -16.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.26% | 88.34% | -47.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.24% | 102.58% | -51.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.02% | 81.23% | -14.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.22% | 106.73% | -40.51% |
TQQQ vs. JNUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than JNUG's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
TQQQ vs. JNUG - Dividend Comparison
TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than JNUG's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2x Shares | 1.81% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 0.10% | 0.46% | 0.06% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.41% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TQQQ and JNUG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JNUG has higher volatility (39.22%) compared to TQQQ (22.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs JNUG's -99.95%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.55% vs -26.31% for JNUG. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 22.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.55% return vs -26.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for JNUG.
JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.41% for TQQQ.
TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 1.17% for JNUG.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TQQQ and JNUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer