TQQQ vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TQQQ is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, TQQQ returned 100.69% vs 1964.55% for INTW. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

TQQQ vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 41.43% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 750.22% return.

TQQQ

• 1D: -9.86%
• 1M: -4.37%
• YTD: 41.43%
• 6M: 35.75%
• 1Y: 100.69%
• 3Y*: 58.02%
• 5Y*: 21.47%
• 10Y*: 45.48%

INTW

• 1D: -12.49%
• 1M: 12.21%
• YTD: 750.22%
• 6M: 775.58%
• 1Y: 1,964.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	41.43%	24.78%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	750.22%	60.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and INTW is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.49

TQQQ vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TQQQ	INTW
Technology	53.8%	66.7%
Communication Services	15.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Industrials	2.8%	-
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	-
Energy	0.6%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 53
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 49
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 52

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 94
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TQQQ	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	13.25	-11.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	5.13	-2.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.65	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	40.32	-37.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.72	91.49	-82.78

TQQQ vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 13.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQQ and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQQQ	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.66%	-60.58%	-21.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.97%	-49.34%	+12.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.65%	-12.49%	-2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.49%	-29.66%	+11.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.59%	21.70%	-10.11%

Volatility

TQQQ vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) is 27.27%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 55.81%. This indicates that TQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TQQQ	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.27%	55.81%	-28.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.35%	119.10%	-75.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.39%	150.14%	-96.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.41%	148.88%	-81.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.32%	148.88%	-82.56%

TQQQ vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TQQQ vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.42%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TQQQ and INTW in my portfolio?

TQQQ and INTW have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TQQQ or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (55.81%) compared to TQQQ (27.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, TQQQ or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1964.55% vs 100.69% for TQQQ. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 27.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TQQQ or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1964.55% return vs 100.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TQQQ or INTW?

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TQQQ or INTW?

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between TQQQ and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.25 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.