TQPAX vs. ESIIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TQPAX (Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund) and ESIIX (Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, TQPAX returned 8.00%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for ESIIX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TQPAX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for ESIIX.

Performance

TQPAX vs. ESIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund (TQPAX) and Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ESIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQPAX achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than ESIIX's 2.18% return.

TQPAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 1.03%
• 6M: 1.44%
• 1Y: 6.73%
• 3Y*: 8.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ESIIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 2.18%
• 6M: 2.83%
• 1Y: 9.72%
• 3Y*: 8.99%
• 5Y*: 5.34%
• 10Y*: 5.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQPAX vs. ESIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TQPAX Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund	1.03%	8.97%	7.26%	8.37%	-9.86%	-0.64%
ESIIX Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I	2.18%	12.46%	6.66%	8.52%	-2.32%	0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TQPAX and ESIIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2021	0.63

The correlation between TQPAX and ESIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.74 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TQPAX vs. ESIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQPAX

TQPAX Risk / Return Rank: 54
TQPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
TQPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
TQPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
TQPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
TQPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

ESIIX

ESIIX Risk / Return Rank: 92
ESIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ESIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ESIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ESIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ESIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQPAX vs. ESIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund (TQPAX) and Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ESIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TQPAX	ESIIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	3.61	-1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	5.41	-2.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.83	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	4.21	-1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.45	16.19	-5.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TQPAX vs. ESIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the ESIIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQPAX and ESIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TQPAX	ESIIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	3.61	-1.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.46	+0.10

Drawdowns

TQPAX vs. ESIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQPAX drawdown since its inception was -16.94%, smaller than the maximum ESIIX drawdown of -26.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQPAX and ESIIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQPAX	ESIIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.94%	-26.87%	+9.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.40%	-2.44%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.17%	-2.46%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-6.18%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-12.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-0.55%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-4.72%	+0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.68%	0.63%	+0.05%

Volatility

TQPAX vs. ESIIX - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund (TQPAX) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ESIIX) at 1.04%. This indicates that TQPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TQPAX	ESIIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.33%	1.04%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.67%	2.22%	+0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.71%	2.84%	+0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.13%	3.19%	+1.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.13%	3.17%	+1.96%

TQPAX vs. ESIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQPAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIIX's 1.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

TQPAX vs. ESIIX - Dividend Comparison

TQPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than ESIIX's 7.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ESIIX Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I	7.39%	7.01%	7.23%	7.19%	5.82%	4.57%	4.44%	5.29%	4.25%	3.95%	4.18%	4.59%
TQPAX Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund	4.67%	4.20%	4.43%	4.95%	4.02%	1.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TQPAX and ESIIX in my portfolio?

TQPAX and ESIIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TQPAX or ESIIX?

TQPAX has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to ESIIX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQPAX dropped -16.94% vs ESIIX's -26.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ESIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.