ESIIX vs. PONPX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ESIIX (Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I) and PONPX (PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ESIIX returned 5.09%/yr vs 4.33%/yr for PONPX. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ESIIX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for PONPX.

Performance

ESIIX vs. PONPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ESIIX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 (PONPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIIX achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly higher than PONPX's 0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ESIIX has outperformed PONPX with an annualized return of 5.09%, while PONPX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.33% annualized return.

ESIIX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.44%
• 6M: 1.06%
• YTD: 2.48%
• 1Y: 7.47%
• 3Y*: 8.55%
• 5Y*: 5.48%
• 10Y*: 5.09%
• ALL TIME*: 5.24%

PONPX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -1.20%
• 6M: -0.40%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 1Y: 4.50%
• 3Y*: 6.80%
• 5Y*: 3.13%
• 10Y*: 4.33%
• ALL TIME*: 7.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ESIIX Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PONPX PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ESIIX vs. PONPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ESIIX Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I	2.48%	12.46%	6.66%	8.52%	-2.32%	1.59%	7.80%	7.65%	-2.44%	5.16%
PONPX PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2	0.18%	10.96%	5.33%	9.24%	-9.14%	2.51%	5.73%	7.99%	0.53%	8.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIIX and PONPX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2009	0.44

Over the past year, ESIIX and PONPX have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.44, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

ESIIX vs. PONPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESIIX

ESIIX Risk / Return Rank: 94
ESIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ESIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ESIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ESIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ESIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

PONPX

PONPX Risk / Return Rank: 50
PONPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
PONPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
PONPX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
PONPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
PONPX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESIIX vs. PONPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ESIIX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 (PONPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESIIX	PONPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	1.40	+1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.17	2.02	+2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.26	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	1.56	+1.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.53	4.94	+7.59

ESIIX vs. PONPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is higher than the PONPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIIX and PONPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESIIX vs. PONPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIIX drawdown since its inception was -26.87%, which is greater than PONPX's maximum drawdown of -13.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIIX and PONPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESIIX	PONPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.87%	-13.41%	-13.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.44%	-3.69%	+1.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.46%	-3.69%	+1.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.18%	-13.41%	+7.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.25%	-13.41%	+1.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-1.72%	+1.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-1.44%	-3.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.66%	1.16%	-0.50%

Volatility

ESIIX vs. PONPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ESIIX) is 0.78%, while PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2 (PONPX) has a volatility of 1.15%. This indicates that ESIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PONPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESIIX	PONPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.78%	1.15%	-0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.35%	3.54%	-1.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89%	4.13%	-1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.22%	4.88%	-1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.16%	4.25%	-1.09%

ESIIX vs. PONPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIIX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than PONPX's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESIIX vs. PONPX - Dividend Comparison

ESIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, more than PONPX's 5.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ESIIX Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I	7.47%	7.01%	7.23%	7.19%	5.82%	4.57%	4.44%	5.29%	4.25%	3.95%	4.18%	4.59%
PONPX PIMCO Income Fund Class I-2	5.23%	5.91%	6.16%	6.11%	4.89%	3.92%	4.78%	5.73%	5.56%	5.27%	5.42%	7.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESIIX and PONPX in my portfolio?

ESIIX and PONPX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ESIIX or PONPX?

PONPX has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to ESIIX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESIIX dropped -26.87% vs PONPX's -13.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ESIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.