TQAIX vs. EMCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund Class I (TQAIX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX).
TQAIX is an actively managed fund by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Apr 25, 2016. EMCAX is managed by Empiric Funds. It was launched on Nov 6, 1995.
Performance
TQAIX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TQAIX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQAIX T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund Class I | -4.60% | 17.53% | 13.10% | 21.34% | -22.38% | 11.32% | 24.01% | 32.92% | -6.77% | 22.26% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | -3.08% | 2.37% | 13.89% | 12.43% | -16.06% | 16.07% | 27.81% | 19.10% | -4.64% | 21.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQAIX achieves a -4.60% return, which is significantly lower than EMCAX's -3.08% return. Over the past 10 years, TQAIX has outperformed EMCAX with an annualized return of 10.96%, while EMCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.33% annualized return.
TQAIX
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -10.24%
- YTD
- -4.60%
- 6M
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- 21.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 4.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
EMCAX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -7.61%
- YTD
- -3.08%
- 6M
- -3.82%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TQAIX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQAIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TQAIX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank
TQAIX
EMCAX
TQAIX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund Class I (TQAIX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TQAIX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 0.28 | +0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 0.52 | +0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.07 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 0.32 | +1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.59 | 1.32 | +4.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TQAIX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 0.28 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.11 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.46 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.44 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between TQAIX and EMCAX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TQAIX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison
TQAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.15%, more than EMCAX's 0.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQAIX T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund Class I | 13.15% | 12.54% | 8.01% | 2.41% | 3.70% | 13.89% | 3.01% | 4.11% | 4.68% | 0.21% | 0.02% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | 0.14% | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 7.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TQAIX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQAIX drawdown since its inception was -37.58%, smaller than the maximum EMCAX drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQAIX and EMCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQAIX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.58% | -51.81% | +14.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.20% | -10.15% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.12% | -30.60% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.58% | -42.79% | +5.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.07% | -8.60% | -3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -13.34% | +5.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 2.47% | +0.95% |
Volatility
TQAIX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund Class I (TQAIX) has a higher volatility of 7.46% compared to Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) at 4.73%. This indicates that TQAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TQAIX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.46% | 4.73% | +2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.16% | 10.17% | +4.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.24% | 17.35% | +5.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.34% | 18.16% | +3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 20.19% | +1.27% |