TPYP vs. TNGY
TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) and TNGY (Tortoise Energy Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. TPYP is passively managed, while TNGY is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPYP charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TNGY.
Performance
TPYP vs. TNGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPYP achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly higher than TNGY's 15.21% return.
TPYP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- 20.07%
- 6M
- 19.62%
- 1Y
- 21.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.01%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
TNGY
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPYP vs. TNGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 20.07% | 2.58% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 15.21% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPYP and TNGY is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPYP vs. TNGY — Risk / Return Rank
TPYP
TNGY
TPYP vs. TNGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPYP | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPYP | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.15 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
TPYP vs. TNGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPYP drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, which is greater than TNGY's maximum drawdown of -8.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPYP and TNGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPYP | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.91% | -8.86% | -43.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.27% | -3.92% | -1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -2.18% | -5.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | — | — |
Volatility
TPYP vs. TNGY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPYP | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 15.70% | -2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 15.70% | +1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 15.70% | +6.24% |
TPYP vs. TNGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPYP has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TNGY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPYP vs. TNGY - Dividend Comparison
TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than TNGY's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 3.41% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.25% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPYP and TNGY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.
TNGY has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 3.25% for TPYP.
They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and Tortoise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TPYP and 0.85% for TNGY.
Find the right allocation for TPYP and TNGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer