TPYP vs. CRAK
TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - TPYP tracks the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index while CRAK tracks the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TPYP returned 11.93%/yr vs 13.28%/yr for CRAK. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPYP charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.
Performance
TPYP vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPYP achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 33.23% return. Over the past 10 years, TPYP has underperformed CRAK with an annualized return of 11.93%, while CRAK has yielded a comparatively higher 13.28% annualized return.
TPYP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- 20.07%
- 6M
- 19.62%
- 1Y
- 21.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.01%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
CRAK
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -1.83%
- YTD
- 33.23%
- 6M
- 27.96%
- 1Y
- 67.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
TPYP vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 20.07% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | 16.09% | 34.97% | -20.99% | 23.35% | -11.13% | 2.27% |
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 33.23% | 39.11% | -15.05% | 13.73% | 19.10% | 10.90% | -11.22% | 9.15% | -10.46% | 49.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPYP and CRAK is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2015 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TPYP and CRAK has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TPYP vs. CRAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TPYP
CRAK
Energy
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
TPYP
CRAK
Utilities
TPYP
CRAK
-
Financial Services
TPYP
CRAK
-
Basic Materials
TPYP
CRAK
Communication Services
TPYP
-
CRAK
-
Consumer Cyclical
TPYP
-
CRAK
-
Consumer Defensive
TPYP
-
CRAK
-
Healthcare
TPYP
-
CRAK
-
Industrials
TPYP
-
CRAK
Real Estate
TPYP
-
CRAK
-
Technology
TPYP
-
CRAK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPYP vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank
TPYP
CRAK
TPYP vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPYP | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.62 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 7.93 | -4.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | 22.48 | -14.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPYP | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 3.70 | -2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.66 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.60 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.54 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
TPYP vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPYP drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, smaller than the maximum CRAK drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPYP and CRAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPYP | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.91% | -58.80% | +6.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | -8.57% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.17% | -35.61% | +22.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.96% | -35.61% | +17.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.91% | -58.80% | +6.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.27% | -3.81% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -12.50% | +4.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 3.02% | -0.46% |
Volatility
TPYP vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) is 5.67%, while VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that TPYP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPYP | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 6.74% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 14.27% | -3.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 18.35% | -5.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 20.61% | -3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 22.16% | -0.22% |
TPYP vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPYP has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPYP vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison
TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than CRAK's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 1.51% | 2.02% | 5.60% | 3.65% | 3.08% | 2.40% | 2.64% | 1.49% | 2.42% | 1.66% | 3.42% | 0.47% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.25% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPYP and CRAK have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRAK has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to TPYP (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPYP dropped -51.91% vs CRAK's -58.80%.
On 10-year performance, CRAK leads with 13.28% vs 11.93% for TPYP. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 13.28% return vs 11.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for CRAK.
TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 1.51% for CRAK.
TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index, while CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TPYP and 0.62% for CRAK.
CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPYP and CRAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer