PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPYP vs. CRAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPYP vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPYP achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 33.23% return. Over the past 10 years, TPYP has underperformed CRAK with an annualized return of 11.93%, while CRAK has yielded a comparatively higher 13.28% annualized return.


TPYP

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
20.07%
6M
19.62%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
25.01%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
11.93%

CRAK

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
33.23%
6M
27.96%
1Y
67.58%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
13.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPYP vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
20.07%7.59%37.37%10.51%16.09%34.97%-20.99%23.35%-11.13%2.27%
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
33.23%39.11%-15.05%13.73%19.10%10.90%-11.22%9.15%-10.46%49.86%

Correlation

The correlation between TPYP and CRAK is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2015

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between TPYP and CRAK has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TPYP vs. CRAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPYP
CRAK

Energy

68.8%
98.9%

Utilities

22.0%

-

Financial Services

2.4%

-

Basic Materials

0.1%
1.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

4.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

TPYP
68.8%
CRAK
98.9%

Utilities

TPYP
22.0%
CRAK

-

Financial Services

TPYP
2.4%
CRAK

-

Basic Materials

TPYP
0.1%
CRAK
1.1%

Communication Services

TPYP

-

CRAK

-

Consumer Cyclical

TPYP

-

CRAK

-

Consumer Defensive

TPYP

-

CRAK

-

Healthcare

TPYP

-

CRAK

-

Industrials

TPYP

-

CRAK
4.0%

Real Estate

TPYP

-

CRAK

-

Technology

TPYP

-

CRAK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPYP vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPYP
TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

CRAK
CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPYP vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPYPCRAKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.62

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

7.93

-4.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.34

22.48

-14.14

TPYP vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPYP Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the CRAK Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPYP and CRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPYPCRAKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

3.70

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.66

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.60

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.54

-0.11

Drawdowns

TPYP vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPYP drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, smaller than the maximum CRAK drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPYP and CRAK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPYPCRAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.91%

-58.80%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

-8.57%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-35.61%

+22.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-35.61%

+17.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.91%

-58.80%

+6.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-3.81%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-12.50%

+4.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

3.02%

-0.46%

Volatility

TPYP vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) is 5.67%, while VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that TPYP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPYPCRAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

6.74%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

14.27%

-3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

18.35%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

20.61%

-3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.94%

22.16%

-0.22%

TPYP vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPYP has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPYP vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than CRAK's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
1.51%2.02%5.60%3.65%3.08%2.40%2.64%1.49%2.42%1.66%3.42%0.47%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
3.25%3.91%3.95%4.83%4.48%4.86%6.14%4.45%4.58%3.71%3.49%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPYP and CRAK have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRAK has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to TPYP (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPYP dropped -51.91% vs CRAK's -58.80%.

On 10-year performance, CRAK leads with 13.28% vs 11.93% for TPYP. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 13.28% return vs 11.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for CRAK.

TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 1.51% for CRAK.

TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index, while CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TPYP and 0.62% for CRAK.

CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPYP and CRAK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer