TPYP vs. BKUI
TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) and BKUI (BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPYP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index, while BKUI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. TPYP is passively managed, while BKUI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TPYP returned 25.01%/yr vs 5.21%/yr for BKUI. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TPYP charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for BKUI.
Performance
TPYP vs. BKUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPYP achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly higher than BKUI's 1.42% return.
TPYP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- 20.07%
- 6M
- 19.62%
- 1Y
- 21.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.01%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
BKUI
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPYP vs. BKUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 20.07% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | 16.09% | 3.63% |
BKUI BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF | 1.42% | 4.93% | 5.50% | 5.75% | -0.08% | -0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPYP and BKUI is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2021 | 0.02 |
The correlation between TPYP and BKUI shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPYP vs. BKUI — Risk / Return Rank
TPYP
BKUI
TPYP vs. BKUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPYP | BKUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -23.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 6.02 | -4.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 32.56 | -29.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | 230.94 | -222.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPYP | BKUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 10.52 | -8.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 6.08 | -5.65 |
Drawdowns
TPYP vs. BKUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPYP drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, which is greater than BKUI's maximum drawdown of -1.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPYP and BKUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPYP | BKUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.91% | -1.72% | -50.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | -0.13% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.17% | -0.25% | -12.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.27% | -0.01% | -5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -0.27% | -7.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 0.02% | +2.54% |
Volatility
TPYP vs. BKUI - Volatility Comparison
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI) at 0.15%. This indicates that TPYP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPYP | BKUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 0.15% | +5.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 0.31% | +9.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 0.41% | +12.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 0.59% | +16.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 0.59% | +21.35% |
TPYP vs. BKUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPYP has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BKUI's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPYP vs. BKUI - Dividend Comparison
TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than BKUI's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKUI BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF | 4.21% | 4.48% | 5.11% | 4.29% | 1.82% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.25% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPYP and BKUI have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TPYP has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to BKUI (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPYP dropped -51.91% vs BKUI's -1.72%.
On 3-year performance, TPYP leads with 25.01% vs 5.21% for BKUI. On fees, BKUI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, BKUI has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 25.01% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKUI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TPYP.
BKUI has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.25% for TPYP.
TPYP is categorized as Energy Equities, while BKUI is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TPYP and 0.12% for BKUI.
BKUI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.52 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPYP and BKUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer