PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPR vs. ULTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TPR vs. ULTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPR achieves a 10.89% return, which is significantly higher than ULTA's -23.51% return. Over the past 10 years, TPR has outperformed ULTA with an annualized return of 17.11%, while ULTA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.79% annualized return.


TPR

1D
0.57%
1M
5.86%
YTD
10.89%
6M
20.82%
1Y
80.77%
3Y*
52.54%
5Y*
29.87%
10Y*
17.11%

ULTA

1D
-0.91%
1M
-11.27%
YTD
-23.51%
6M
-21.47%
1Y
-0.61%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
6.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPR vs. ULTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
10.89%98.73%82.80%0.16%-3.32%32.29%16.86%-15.97%-22.09%30.48%
ULTA
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
-23.51%39.11%-11.24%4.46%13.76%43.59%13.44%3.39%9.47%-12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TPR and ULTA is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2007

0.43

The correlation between TPR and ULTA shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TPR:

$29.35B

ULTA:

$20.35B

EPS

TPR:

$3.15

ULTA:

$26.57

PE Ratio

TPR:

44.72

ULTA:

17.42

PS Ratio

TPR:

3.78

ULTA:

1.63

PB Ratio

TPR:

43.01

ULTA:

7.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

TPR:

$7.85B

ULTA:

$12.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TPR:

$5.98B

ULTA:

$5.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

TPR:

$1.06B

ULTA:

$1.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPR vs. ULTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPR
TPR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
TPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ULTA
ULTA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ULTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULTA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ULTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULTA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPR vs. ULTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPRULTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.03

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

-0.02

+4.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.73

-0.05

+10.78

TPR vs. ULTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the ULTA Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPR and ULTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPRULTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

-0.02

+2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.20

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.18

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.35

+0.09

Drawdowns

TPR vs. ULTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPR drawdown since its inception was -82.55%, smaller than the maximum ULTA drawdown of -87.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPR and ULTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPRULTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.55%

-87.89%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.21%

-34.56%

+15.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.54%

-44.56%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.87%

-44.56%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.06%

-64.92%

-14.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.72%

-34.52%

+22.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.74%

-20.80%

-6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.55%

13.51%

-5.96%

Volatility

TPR vs. ULTA - Volatility Comparison

Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) and Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) have volatilities of 8.83% and 9.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPRULTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.83%

9.07%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.95%

27.67%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.87%

33.25%

+7.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.24%

34.25%

+5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.23%

38.32%

+5.91%

Dividends

TPR vs. ULTA - Dividend Comparison

TPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, while ULTA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
1.14%1.17%2.14%3.53%2.89%1.23%1.09%5.01%3.00%3.06%3.85%4.13%
ULTA
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TPR vs. ULTA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tapestry, Inc. and Ulta Beauty, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20222023202420252026
1.92B
3.16B
(TPR) Total Revenue
(ULTA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TPR vs. ULTA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tapestry, Inc. and Ulta Beauty, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
76.9%
40.1%
Portfolio components
TPR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.48B and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

ULTA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.27B and revenue of 3.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.

TPR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported an operating income of 427.50M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.

ULTA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 448.26M and revenue of 3.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.

TPR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a net income of 343.80M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.

ULTA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ulta Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of 340.47M and revenue of 3.16B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TPR and ULTA have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULTA has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to TPR (8.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPR dropped -82.55% vs ULTA's -87.89%.

TPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPR and ULTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer