TPOR vs. MULL
TPOR (Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TPOR is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. Over the past year, TPOR returned 72.44% vs 6074.28% for MULL. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TPOR charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
TPOR vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPOR achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.
TPOR
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 22.42%
- YTD
- 28.21%
- 6M
- 24.20%
- 1Y
- 72.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.48%
- 5Y*
- -2.85%
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 216.81%
- YTD
- 936.86%
- 6M
- 1,369.93%
- 1Y
- 6,074.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPOR vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TPOR Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares | 28.21% | 3.26% | -22.26% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 936.86% | 558.51% | -40.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPOR and MULL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024 | 0.29 |
TPOR vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TPOR
MULL
Industrials
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
TPOR
MULL
-
Technology
TPOR
MULL
Basic Materials
TPOR
-
MULL
-
Communication Services
TPOR
-
MULL
-
Consumer Cyclical
TPOR
-
MULL
-
Consumer Defensive
TPOR
-
MULL
-
Energy
TPOR
-
MULL
-
Financial Services
TPOR
-
MULL
-
Healthcare
TPOR
-
MULL
-
Real Estate
TPOR
-
MULL
-
Utilities
TPOR
-
MULL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPOR vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
TPOR
MULL
TPOR vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPOR | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 46.71 | -45.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 7.02 | -5.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.89 | -0.67 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 116.34 | -114.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.07 | 390.40 | -384.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPOR | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 46.71 | -45.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 7.45 | -7.36 |
Drawdowns
TPOR vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPOR drawdown since its inception was -87.59%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPOR and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPOR | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.59% | -72.29% | -15.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.00% | -53.09% | +19.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.66% | 0.00% | -31.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.70% | -20.62% | -18.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.98% | 15.79% | -3.81% |
Volatility
TPOR vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) is 16.85%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.41%. This indicates that TPOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPOR | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.85% | 55.41% | -38.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.80% | 105.59% | -60.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.27% | 132.38% | -73.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.75% | 136.22% | -68.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.94% | 136.22% | -65.28% |
TPOR vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPOR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPOR vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
TPOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPOR Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares | 0.71% | 0.91% | 1.43% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.96% | 1.22% | 8.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPOR and MULL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to TPOR (16.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPOR dropped -87.59% vs MULL's -72.29%.
On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs 72.44% for TPOR. On fees, TPOR is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TPOR has been the lower-risk option at 16.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs 72.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPOR is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
TPOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TPOR and 1.50% for MULL.
MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPOR and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer