PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPOR vs. INTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPOR vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPOR achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 750.22% return.


TPOR

1D
-2.19%
1M
7.81%
YTD
28.21%
6M
23.96%
1Y
67.02%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
-0.87%
10Y*

INTW

1D
-12.49%
1M
12.21%
YTD
750.22%
6M
775.58%
1Y
1,964.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPOR vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TPOR and INTW is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

0.36

TPOR vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPOR
INTW

Industrials

84.7%

-

Technology

15.3%
66.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

TPOR
84.7%
INTW

-

Technology

TPOR
15.3%
INTW
66.7%

Basic Materials

TPOR

-

INTW

-

Communication Services

TPOR

-

INTW

-

Consumer Cyclical

TPOR

-

INTW

-

Consumer Defensive

TPOR

-

INTW

-

Energy

TPOR

-

INTW

-

Financial Services

TPOR

-

INTW

-

Healthcare

TPOR

-

INTW

-

Real Estate

TPOR

-

INTW

-

Utilities

TPOR

-

INTW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPOR vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPOR
TPOR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TPOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPOR Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TPOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPOR Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

INTW
INTW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPOR vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPORINTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-12.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.65

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

40.32

-38.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.63

91.49

-85.86

TPOR vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 13.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPOR and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPOR vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPOR drawdown since its inception was -87.59%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPOR and INTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPORINTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.59%

-60.58%

-27.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.00%

-49.34%

+15.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.66%

-12.49%

-19.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.63%

-29.66%

-8.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.94%

21.70%

-9.76%

Volatility

TPOR vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) is 20.81%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 55.81%. This indicates that TPOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPORINTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.81%

55.81%

-35.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.27%

119.10%

-71.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.65%

150.14%

-89.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.03%

148.88%

-80.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.97%

148.88%

-77.91%

TPOR vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPOR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPOR vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

TPOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
INTW
GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPOR
Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares
0.71%0.91%1.43%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.96%1.22%8.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPOR and INTW have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTW has higher volatility (55.81%) compared to TPOR (20.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPOR dropped -87.59% vs INTW's -60.58%.

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1964.55% vs 67.02% for TPOR. On fees, TPOR is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TPOR has been the lower-risk option at 20.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1964.55% return vs 67.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TPOR is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

TPOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TPOR and 1.50% for INTW.

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.25 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPOR and INTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer