PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPOR vs. FAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPOR vs. FAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPOR achieves a 30.09% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's -21.74% return.


TPOR

1D
-2.92%
1M
9.78%
YTD
30.09%
6M
35.48%
1Y
78.36%
3Y*
18.05%
5Y*
-2.89%
10Y*

FAS

1D
0.24%
1M
-3.63%
YTD
-21.74%
6M
-12.79%
1Y
-8.69%
3Y*
35.72%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
18.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPOR vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPOR
Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares
30.09%3.26%-9.12%54.60%-58.70%105.18%-7.30%47.92%-44.95%52.32%
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
-21.74%21.48%84.47%14.92%-43.19%116.59%-34.97%113.04%-33.84%52.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TPOR and FAS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2017

0.72

The correlation between TPOR and FAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TPOR vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPOR
FAS

Industrials

83.3%
0.2%

Technology

16.7%
1.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

98.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

TPOR
83.3%
FAS
0.2%

Technology

TPOR
16.7%
FAS
1.7%

Basic Materials

TPOR

-

FAS

-

Communication Services

TPOR

-

FAS

-

Consumer Cyclical

TPOR

-

FAS

-

Consumer Defensive

TPOR

-

FAS

-

Energy

TPOR

-

FAS

-

Financial Services

TPOR

-

FAS
98.0%

Healthcare

TPOR

-

FAS

-

Real Estate

TPOR

-

FAS

-

Utilities

TPOR

-

FAS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPOR vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPOR
TPOR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
TPOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPOR Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TPOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPOR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FAS
FAS Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPOR vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPORFASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

-0.20

+1.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.91

0.00

+1.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.00

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

-0.20

+2.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.30

-0.47

+6.77

TPOR vs. FAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the FAS Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPOR and FAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPORFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

-0.20

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.07

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.20

-0.10

Drawdowns

TPOR vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPOR drawdown since its inception was -87.59%, roughly equal to the maximum FAS drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPOR and FAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPORFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.59%

-91.61%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.00%

-40.88%

+6.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.11%

-43.10%

-21.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.08%

-66.88%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.66%

-28.19%

-2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.70%

-31.11%

-7.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.97%

17.40%

-5.43%

Volatility

TPOR vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) has a higher volatility of 21.40% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) at 9.05%. This indicates that TPOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPORFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.40%

9.05%

+12.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.77%

32.42%

+12.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.28%

42.62%

+16.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.75%

55.46%

+12.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.96%

61.30%

+9.66%

TPOR vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPOR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FAS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPOR vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison

TPOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than FAS's 10.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
10.66%8.21%0.76%1.77%0.91%0.60%0.47%0.62%1.43%0.11%
TPOR
Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares
0.70%0.91%1.43%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.96%1.22%8.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPOR and FAS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPOR has higher volatility (21.40%) compared to FAS (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPOR dropped -87.59% vs FAS's -91.61%.

On 5-year performance, FAS leads with 3.84% vs -2.89% for TPOR. On fees, FAS is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 9.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FAS has performed better with a 3.84% return vs -2.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FAS is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TPOR.

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 10.66%, compared with 0.70% for TPOR.

TPOR tracks Dow Jones Transportation Average Index (300%), while FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TPOR and 1.00% for FAS.

TPOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPOR and FAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer