TPLS vs. DBND
TPLS (Thornburg Core Plus Bond ETF) and DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. TPLS is actively managed, while DBND is passively managed. Over the past year, TPLS returned 5.39% vs 4.38% for DBND. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPLS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DBND.
Performance
TPLS vs. DBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPLS achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than DBND's -0.12% return.
TPLS
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 5.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBND
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPLS vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TPLS Thornburg Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.32% | 5.59% |
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | -0.12% | 5.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPLS and DBND is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | 0.93 |
The correlation between TPLS and DBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPLS vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank
TPLS
DBND
TPLS vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Core Plus Bond ETF (TPLS) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPLS | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.55 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.10 | 4.58 | +0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPLS | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.35 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.48 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
TPLS vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPLS drawdown since its inception was -3.04%, smaller than the maximum DBND drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLS and DBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPLS | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -9.39% | +6.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -2.83% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -1.71% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -2.27% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 0.96% | +0.10% |
Volatility
TPLS vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison
Thornburg Core Plus Bond ETF (TPLS) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) at 1.08%. This indicates that TPLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPLS | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 1.08% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.75% | 2.33% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93% | 3.30% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.54% | 5.09% | -0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.54% | 5.09% | -0.55% |
TPLS vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPLS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPLS vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison
TPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, less than DBND's 4.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | 4.78% | 4.78% | 5.19% | 4.39% | 2.74% |
TPLS Thornburg Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.61% | 4.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, TPLS and DBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TPLS has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to DBND (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLS dropped -3.04% vs DBND's -9.39%.
On 1-year performance, TPLS leads with 5.39% vs 4.38% for DBND. On fees, TPLS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TPLS has performed better with a 5.39% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPLS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.
DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 4.61% for TPLS.
They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for TPLS and 0.50% for DBND.
TPLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPLS and DBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer