TPLGX vs. CHASX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TPLGX (T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund) and CHASX (Chase Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TPLGX returned 16.48%/yr vs 20.48%/yr for CHASX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPLGX charges 0.57%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for CHASX.

Performance

TPLGX vs. CHASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPLGX achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than CHASX's 24.18% return. Over the past 10 years, TPLGX has underperformed CHASX with an annualized return of 16.48%, while CHASX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.48% annualized return.

TPLGX

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: -5.04%
• YTD: -1.63%
• 6M: -2.94%
• 1Y: 11.29%
• 3Y*: 21.25%
• 5Y*: 8.81%
• 10Y*: 16.48%

CHASX

• 1D: -1.90%
• 1M: 2.67%
• YTD: 24.18%
• 6M: 22.01%
• 1Y: 45.60%
• 3Y*: 40.76%
• 5Y*: 21.98%
• 10Y*: 20.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPLGX vs. CHASX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TPLGX T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund	-1.63%	18.66%	35.22%	49.63%	-38.49%	17.84%	34.70%	30.15%	2.18%	36.49%
CHASX Chase Growth Fund	24.18%	20.61%	64.71%	25.91%	-20.41%	22.32%	18.27%	42.63%	-3.96%	24.49%

Correlation

The correlation between TPLGX and CHASX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2003	0.89

The correlation between TPLGX and CHASX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TPLGX vs. CHASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPLGX

TPLGX Risk / Return Rank: 10
TPLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
TPLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
TPLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
TPLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
TPLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

CHASX

CHASX Risk / Return Rank: 86
CHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
CHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
CHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPLGX vs. CHASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPLGX	CHASX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	2.63	-1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	3.41	-2.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.44	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	4.86	-4.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.44	20.09	-17.64

TPLGX vs. CHASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPLGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the CHASX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPLGX and CHASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TPLGX vs. CHASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPLGX drawdown since its inception was -54.57%, which is greater than CHASX's maximum drawdown of -45.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLGX and CHASX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPLGX	CHASX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.57%	-45.94%	-8.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.15%	-9.90%	-7.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.23%	-23.40%	-4.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.45%	-24.63%	-18.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.45%	-30.40%	-13.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.39%	-2.10%	-5.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.66%	-9.14%	+0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.27%	2.39%	+2.88%

Volatility

TPLGX vs. CHASX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) have volatilities of 6.69% and 6.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPLGX	CHASX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.69%	6.89%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.24%	14.38%	-1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.68%	18.33%	-1.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.44%	20.38%	+4.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.95%	19.95%	+3.00%

TPLGX vs. CHASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPLGX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than CHASX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPLGX vs. CHASX - Dividend Comparison

TPLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.64%, more than CHASX's 7.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHASX Chase Growth Fund	7.35%	9.12%	36.67%	5.80%	5.49%	20.15%	7.83%	22.82%	12.92%	11.92%	9.14%	10.24%
TPLGX T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund	20.64%	20.30%	12.87%	3.70%	4.39%	8.81%	0.59%	0.60%	1.65%	1.39%	0.25%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPLGX and CHASX in my portfolio?

TPLGX and CHASX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TPLGX or CHASX?

CHASX has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to TPLGX (6.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLGX dropped -54.57% vs CHASX's -45.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.