TPL vs. PANW
TPL (Texas Pacific Land Corporation) and PANW (Palo Alto Networks, Inc.) are both stocks. TPL operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while PANW operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, TPL returned 36.58%/yr vs 29.12%/yr for PANW. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TPL vs. PANW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPL achieves a 32.28% return, which is significantly lower than PANW's 51.80% return. Over the past 10 years, TPL has outperformed PANW with an annualized return of 36.58%, while PANW has yielded a comparatively lower 29.12% annualized return.
TPL
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 32.28%
- 6M
- 35.91%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- 38.06%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 36.58%
PANW
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 22.75%
- YTD
- 51.80%
- 6M
- 45.87%
- 1Y
- 41.46%
- 3Y*
- 33.77%
- 5Y*
- 35.61%
- 10Y*
- 29.12%
TPL vs. PANW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPL Texas Pacific Land Corporation | 32.28% | -21.61% | 115.31% | -32.40% | 91.29% | 73.25% | -4.69% | 44.58% | 21.96% | 51.18% |
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 51.80% | 1.23% | 23.41% | 111.32% | -24.81% | 56.66% | 53.68% | 22.78% | 29.95% | 15.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPL and PANW is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2012 | 0.13 |
The correlation between TPL and PANW shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.14 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TPL:
$26.15B
PANW:
$208.04B
TPL:
$7.30
PANW:
$1.17
TPL:
51.93
PANW:
238.46
TPL:
2.75
PANW:
0.02
TPL:
31.17
PANW:
18.95
TPL:
16.81
PANW:
7.52
TPL:
$839.03M
PANW:
$10.61B
TPL:
$625.27M
PANW:
$7.63B
TPL:
$690.06M
PANW:
$1.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPL vs. PANW — Risk / Return Rank
TPL
PANW
TPL vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPL | PANW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.21 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 1.16 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | 2.62 | -2.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPL vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPL drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPL and PANW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPL | PANW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.05% | -47.98% | -25.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.68% | -36.01% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.22% | -36.01% | -16.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.50% | -36.01% | -16.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.46% | -47.98% | -17.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.65% | -6.94% | -26.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.27% | -14.68% | -12.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.08% | 15.87% | +1.21% |
Volatility
TPL vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) is 14.23%, while Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a volatility of 16.97%. This indicates that TPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPL | PANW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.23% | 16.97% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.06% | 32.33% | +5.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.87% | 38.96% | +7.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.25% | 41.72% | +4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.10% | 38.62% | +8.48% |
Dividends
TPL vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison
TPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, while PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPL Texas Pacific Land Corporation | 0.60% | 0.74% | 1.37% | 0.83% | 1.37% | 0.88% | 2.20% | 0.22% | 0.55% | 0.30% | 0.10% | 0.22% |
Financials
TPL vs. PANW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Texas Pacific Land Corporation and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TPL vs. PANW - Profitability Comparison
TPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 236.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PANW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
TPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported an operating income of 182.33M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 77.0%.
PANW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of -186.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.2%.
TPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a net income of 142.90M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in a net margin of 60.3%.
PANW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of -177.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of -5.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TPL and PANW have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PANW has higher volatility (16.97%) compared to TPL (14.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPL dropped -73.05% vs PANW's -47.98%.
PANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPL and PANW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer