TPL vs. GLCC.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

TPL (Texas Pacific Land Corporation) is a stock, while GLCC.TO (Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X. Over the past 10 years, TPL returned 36.58%/yr vs 12.92%/yr for GLCC.TO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TPL vs. GLCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

TPL is traded in USD, while GLCC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GLCC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPL achieves a 32.28% return, which is significantly higher than GLCC.TO's -7.03% return. Over the past 10 years, TPL has outperformed GLCC.TO with an annualized return of 36.58%, while GLCC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.92% annualized return.

TPL

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: -1.47%
• YTD: 32.28%
• 6M: 35.91%
• 1Y: 2.17%
• 3Y*: 38.06%
• 5Y*: 18.80%
• 10Y*: 36.58%

GLCC.TO

• 1D: 2.73%
• 1M: -14.47%
• YTD: -7.03%
• 6M: -4.99%
• 1Y: 44.60%
• 3Y*: 37.94%
• 5Y*: 16.80%
• 10Y*: 12.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPL vs. GLCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TPL Texas Pacific Land Corporation	32.28%	-21.61%	115.31%	-32.40%	91.29%	73.25%	-4.69%	44.58%	21.96%	51.18%
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	-7.03%	148.79%	10.80%	8.78%	-7.65%	-9.33%	17.79%	44.67%	-8.11%	15.12%

Correlation

The correlation between TPL and GLCC.TO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2011	0.06

Return for Risk

TPL vs. GLCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPL

TPL Risk / Return Rank: 45
TPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
TPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
TPL Omega Ratio Rank: 43
TPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
TPL Martin Ratio Rank: 45

GLCC.TO

GLCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 35
GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
GLCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
GLCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 37
GLCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
GLCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPL vs. GLCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPL	GLCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	1.08	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.46	1.52	-1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.21	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	1.37	-1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.25	3.97	-3.72

TPL vs. GLCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPL and GLCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TPL vs. GLCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPL drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, smaller than the maximum GLCC.TO drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPL and GLCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPL	GLCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.05%	-87.15%	+14.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.68%	-34.36%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.22%	-34.36%	-17.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.50%	-41.98%	-10.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.46%	-45.72%	-19.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.65%	-28.59%	-5.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.27%	-62.40%	+35.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.08%	11.84%	+5.24%

Volatility

TPL vs. GLCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) is 14.23%, while Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) has a volatility of 16.67%. This indicates that TPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPL	GLCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.23%	16.67%	-2.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.06%	36.09%	+1.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.87%	43.61%	+3.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.25%	33.07%	+13.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.10%	32.84%	+14.26%

Dividends

TPL vs. GLCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

TPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than GLCC.TO's 9.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	9.12%	6.01%	10.30%	11.16%	10.08%	6.31%	6.47%	4.58%	5.62%	7.08%	8.75%	2.32%
TPL Texas Pacific Land Corporation	0.60%	0.74%	1.37%	0.83%	1.37%	0.88%	2.20%	0.22%	0.55%	0.30%	0.10%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPL and GLCC.TO in my portfolio?

TPL and GLCC.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.