TPL vs. BTAL

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

TPL (Texas Pacific Land Corporation) is a stock, while BTAL (AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund) is Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by AGF. Over the past 10 years, TPL returned 37.28%/yr vs -4.60%/yr for BTAL. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

TPL vs. BTAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPL achieves a 41.69% return, which is significantly higher than BTAL's -15.84% return. Over the past 10 years, TPL has outperformed BTAL with an annualized return of 37.28%, while BTAL has yielded a comparatively lower -4.60% annualized return.

TPL

• 1D: -2.36%
• 1M: 14.29%
• 6M: 20.59%
• YTD: 41.69%
• 1Y: 22.88%
• 3Y*: 36.95%
• 5Y*: 20.54%
• 10Y*: 37.28%
• ALL TIME*: 20.04%

BTAL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 10.49%
• 6M: -12.25%
• YTD: -15.84%
• 1Y: -25.57%
• 3Y*: -9.44%
• 5Y*: -4.30%
• 10Y*: -4.60%
• ALL TIME*: -3.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPL vs. BTAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TPL Texas Pacific Land Corporation	41.69%	-21.61%	115.31%	-32.40%	91.29%	73.25%	-4.69%	44.58%	21.96%	51.18%
BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund	-15.84%	-20.17%	12.83%	-15.11%	20.48%	-6.81%	-13.86%	1.07%	15.13%	-2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between TPL and BTAL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2011	-0.25

Return for Risk

TPL vs. BTAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPL

TPL Risk / Return Rank: 61
TPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
TPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
TPL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
TPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
TPL Martin Ratio Rank: 62

BTAL

BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPL vs. BTAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPL	BTAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	-1.09	+1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	-1.58	+2.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	0.83	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	-0.74	+1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.49	-1.39	+2.89

TPL vs. BTAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the BTAL Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPL and BTAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TPL vs. BTAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPL drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, which is greater than BTAL's maximum drawdown of -52.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPL and BTAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPL	BTAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.05%	-52.70%	-20.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.23%	-34.57%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.22%	-47.83%	-4.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.50%	-47.83%	-4.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.46%	-52.70%	-12.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.92%	-47.55%	+18.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.27%	-22.19%	-5.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.40%	18.40%	-3.00%

Volatility

TPL vs. BTAL - Volatility Comparison

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) has a higher volatility of 11.61% compared to AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) at 7.95%. This indicates that TPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPL	BTAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.61%	7.95%	+3.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.08%	17.50%	+19.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.66%	23.51%	+24.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.23%	19.27%	+26.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.27%	17.40%	+29.87%

Dividends

TPL vs. BTAL - Dividend Comparison

TPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than BTAL's 2.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund	2.96%	2.49%	3.49%	6.14%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.88%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TPL Texas Pacific Land Corporation	0.56%	0.74%	1.37%	0.83%	1.37%	0.88%	2.20%	0.22%	0.55%	0.30%	0.10%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPL and BTAL in my portfolio?

TPL and BTAL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TPL or BTAL?

TPL has higher volatility (11.61%) compared to BTAL (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPL dropped -73.05% vs BTAL's -52.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.