PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPL vs. ANET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TPL vs. ANET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPL achieves a 32.28% return, which is significantly higher than ANET's 24.58% return. Over the past 10 years, TPL has underperformed ANET with an annualized return of 36.58%, while ANET has yielded a comparatively higher 43.12% annualized return.


TPL

1D
2.53%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
32.28%
6M
35.91%
1Y
4.22%
3Y*
38.06%
5Y*
18.80%
10Y*
36.58%

ANET

1D
4.37%
1M
16.03%
YTD
24.58%
6M
30.84%
1Y
70.45%
3Y*
57.04%
5Y*
48.31%
10Y*
43.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPL vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
32.28%-21.61%115.31%-32.40%91.29%73.25%-4.69%44.58%21.96%51.18%
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
24.58%18.55%87.73%94.07%-15.58%97.89%42.86%-3.46%-10.56%143.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TPL and ANET is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TPL:

$26.15B

ANET:

$207.94B

EPS

TPL:

$7.30

ANET:

$2.92

PE Ratio

TPL:

51.93

ANET:

55.91

PEG Ratio

TPL:

2.75

ANET:

1.31

PS Ratio

TPL:

31.17

ANET:

21.42

PB Ratio

TPL:

16.81

ANET:

15.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

TPL:

$839.03M

ANET:

$9.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TPL:

$625.27M

ANET:

$6.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

TPL:

$690.06M

ANET:

$4.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPL vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPL
TPL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPL Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPL vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPLANETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.24

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

2.50

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.25

5.20

-4.95

TPL vs. ANET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the ANET Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPL and ANET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPL vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPL drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, which is greater than ANET's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPL and ANET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLANETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.05%

-52.20%

-20.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.68%

-28.33%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.22%

-50.42%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.50%

-50.42%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.46%

-52.20%

-13.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.65%

-8.15%

-25.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.27%

-15.39%

-11.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.08%

13.60%

+3.48%

Volatility

TPL vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) is 14.23%, while Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a volatility of 16.62%. This indicates that TPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPLANETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.23%

16.62%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.06%

40.79%

-2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.87%

53.57%

-6.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.25%

47.23%

-0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.10%

45.00%

+2.10%

Dividends

TPL vs. ANET - Dividend Comparison

TPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, while ANET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
0.60%0.74%1.37%0.83%1.37%0.88%2.20%0.22%0.55%0.30%0.10%0.22%

Financials

TPL vs. ANET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Texas Pacific Land Corporation and Arista Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
236.82M
2.71B
(TPL) Total Revenue
(ANET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TPL vs. ANET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Texas Pacific Land Corporation and Arista Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
61.9%
Portfolio components
TPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 236.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ANET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

TPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported an operating income of 182.33M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 77.0%.

ANET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

TPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a net income of 142.90M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in a net margin of 60.3%.

ANET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TPL and ANET have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANET has higher volatility (16.62%) compared to TPL (14.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPL dropped -73.05% vs ANET's -52.20%.

ANET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPL and ANET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer