TOV vs. SCHK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TOV (JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - TOV tracks the JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. Index while SCHK tracks the Schwab 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TOV returned 23.74% vs 23.67% for SCHK. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TOV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.

Performance

TOV vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with TOV at 8.54% and SCHK at 8.54%.

TOV

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 8.54%
• 6M: 7.36%
• 1Y: 23.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHK

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: 8.54%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: 20.74%
• 5Y*: 12.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOV vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TOV JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF	8.54%	14.91%
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	8.54%	15.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TOV and SCHK is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025	0.98

The correlation between TOV and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

TOV vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TOV	SCHK
Technology	39.4%	38.0%
Financial Services	11.1%	11.2%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	9.8%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.0%	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	4.3%
Energy	3.2%	3.2%
Utilities	2.0%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.6%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.5%	1.9%

Return for Risk

TOV vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOV

TOV Risk / Return Rank: 63
TOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
TOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
TOV Omega Ratio Rank: 61
TOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
TOV Martin Ratio Rank: 69

SCHK

SCHK Risk / Return Rank: 58
SCHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
SCHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SCHK Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SCHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SCHK Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOV vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TOV	SCHK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.86	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	2.53	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.33	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.65	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.52	11.81	-0.29

TOV vs. SCHK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the SCHK Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOV and SCHK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TOV vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOV drawdown since its inception was -16.97%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOV and SCHK.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOV	SCHK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.97%	-34.80%	+17.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-8.97%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.21%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.07%	-2.98%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.20%	-5.16%	+2.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	2.01%	+0.06%

Volatility

TOV vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) is 4.65%, while Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that TOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOV	SCHK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	4.96%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	10.10%	+0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.80%	12.84%	-0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.01%	17.34%	+0.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.01%	19.12%	-1.11%

TOV vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TOV vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison

TOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than SCHK's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	1.03%	1.09%	1.20%	1.38%	1.57%	1.17%	1.58%	1.82%	1.80%	0.31%
TOV JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF	0.84%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOV and SCHK in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, TOV and SCHK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TOV or SCHK?

SCHK has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to TOV (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOV dropped -16.97% vs SCHK's -34.80%.

Which ETF is better, TOV or SCHK?

On 1-year performance, TOV leads with 23.74% vs 23.67% for SCHK. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, TOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TOV or SCHK?

Over the 1-year period, TOV has performed better with a 23.74% return vs 23.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOV or SCHK?

SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for TOV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOV or SCHK?

SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.84% for TOV.

What is the main difference between TOV and SCHK?

TOV tracks JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. Index, while SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: JLens and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TOV and 0.03% for SCHK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.