TOV vs. FNDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TOV (JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. Index, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TOV returned 28.12% vs 33.72% for FNDX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TOV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.

Performance

TOV vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOV achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 15.35% return.

TOV

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: 11.31%
• 6M: 11.06%
• 1Y: 28.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDX

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 3.54%
• YTD: 15.35%
• 6M: 15.57%
• 1Y: 33.72%
• 3Y*: 21.32%
• 5Y*: 12.98%
• 10Y*: 14.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOV vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TOV JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF	11.31%	17.49%
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	15.35%	13.95%

Correlation

The correlation between TOV and FNDX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025	0.83

The correlation between TOV and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

TOV vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TOV	FNDX
Technology	35.7%	19.1%
Financial Services	11.9%	14.1%
Communication Services	11.5%	10.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	9.2%
Healthcare	8.7%	12.0%
Industrials	8.4%	9.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	7.4%
Energy	3.6%	10.3%
Utilities	2.2%	3.2%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.6%	3.7%

Return for Risk

TOV vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOV

TOV Risk / Return Rank: 71
TOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
TOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
TOV Omega Ratio Rank: 70
TOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
TOV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FNDX

FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 92
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOV vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TOV	FNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	3.32	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	4.64	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.61	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	5.59	-2.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.17	21.88	-7.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TOV vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is lower than the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOV and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TOV	FNDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	3.32	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	0.80	+0.54

Drawdowns

TOV vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOV drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOV and FNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOV	FNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.28%	-37.72%	+21.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-6.06%	-2.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	0.00%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.04%	-3.55%	+1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	1.55%	+0.44%

Volatility

TOV vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.15%. This indicates that TOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOV	FNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	2.15%	+1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.37%	7.27%	+2.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.23%	10.22%	+2.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.87%	15.18%	+2.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.87%	17.50%	+0.37%

TOV vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TOV vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

TOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than FNDX's 1.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	1.44%	1.63%	1.76%	1.82%	2.07%	1.64%	2.29%	2.23%	2.40%	1.86%	2.01%	2.01%
TOV JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF	0.82%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOV and FNDX in my portfolio?

TOV and FNDX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TOV or FNDX?

TOV has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to FNDX (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOV dropped -16.28% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

Which ETF is better, TOV or FNDX?

On 1-year performance, FNDX leads with 33.72% vs 28.12% for TOV. On fees, TOV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TOV or FNDX?

Over the 1-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 33.72% return vs 28.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOV or FNDX?

TOV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOV or FNDX?

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.82% for TOV.

What is the main difference between TOV and FNDX?

TOV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. TOV tracks JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: JLens and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TOV and 0.25% for FNDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.