TOUS vs. CIL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TOUS (T. Rowe Price International Equity ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. TOUS is actively managed, while CIL is passively managed. Over the past year, TOUS returned 21.92% vs 16.45% for CIL. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TOUS charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.

Performance

TOUS vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price International Equity ETF (TOUS) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOUS achieves a 10.20% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.

TOUS

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 4.65%
• YTD: 10.20%
• 6M: 12.42%
• 1Y: 21.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 7.75%
• 1Y: 16.45%
• 3Y*: 15.79%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOUS vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TOUS T. Rowe Price International Equity ETF	10.20%	34.00%	3.63%	3.38%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TOUS and CIL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023	0.86

The correlation between TOUS and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TOUS vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TOUS	CIL
Financial Services	22.2%	24.8%
Industrials	19.7%	18.4%
Technology	13.0%	6.4%
Healthcare	10.1%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.9%	8.8%
Basic Materials	5.5%	6.6%
Energy	5.5%	4.6%
Communication Services	4.6%	5.8%
Utilities	3.4%	6.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.2%

Return for Risk

TOUS vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOUS

TOUS Risk / Return Rank: 41
TOUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
TOUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
TOUS Omega Ratio Rank: 42
TOUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
TOUS Martin Ratio Rank: 41

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 74
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOUS vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Equity ETF (TOUS) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TOUS	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	2.13	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	3.06	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.46	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	3.74	-1.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.55	15.85	-9.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TOUS vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOUS and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TOUS	CIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	2.13	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	0.43	+0.67

Drawdowns

TOUS vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOUS drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOUS and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOUS	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.29%	-36.27%	+21.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.23%	-4.60%	-7.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.96%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-0.58%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.83%	-6.55%	+3.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	1.07%	+2.28%

Volatility

TOUS vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price International Equity ETF (TOUS) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that TOUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOUS	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.12%	0.00%	+5.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.02%	4.08%	+8.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.30%	8.12%	+7.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.18%	16.49%	-1.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.18%	17.17%	-1.99%

TOUS vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOUS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOUS vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

TOUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than CIL's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	1.67%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%
TOUS T. Rowe Price International Equity ETF	1.58%	1.74%	3.01%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOUS and CIL in my portfolio?

TOUS and CIL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TOUS or CIL?

TOUS has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOUS dropped -14.29% vs CIL's -36.27%.

Which ETF is better, TOUS or CIL?

On 1-year performance, TOUS leads with 21.92% vs 16.45% for CIL. On fees, CIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TOUS or CIL?

Over the 1-year period, TOUS has performed better with a 21.92% return vs 16.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOUS or CIL?

CIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TOUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOUS or CIL?

CIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.58% for TOUS.

What is the main difference between TOUS and CIL?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TOUS and 0.45% for CIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.