TOTR vs. MBS
TOTR (T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF) and MBS (Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TOTR returned 5.48% vs 6.88% for MBS. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TOTR charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MBS.
Performance
TOTR vs. MBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOTR achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than MBS's 0.62% return.
TOTR
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 5.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 6.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOTR vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TOTR T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF | 0.31% | 7.41% | 4.08% |
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.62% | 8.13% | 5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOTR and MBS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2024 | 0.59 |
The correlation between TOTR and MBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOTR vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank
TOTR
MBS
TOTR vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOTR | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.45 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 3.14 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | 9.89 | -3.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOTR | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 2.36 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 1.60 | -1.64 |
Drawdowns
TOTR vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOTR drawdown since its inception was -19.63%, which is greater than MBS's maximum drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOTR and MBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOTR | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.63% | -4.09% | -15.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.56% | -2.20% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -1.46% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -1.02% | -7.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 0.70% | +0.15% |
Volatility
TOTR vs. MBS - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) at 0.90%. This indicates that TOTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOTR | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 0.90% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 2.00% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.37% | 2.93% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.22% | 3.99% | +2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.22% | 3.99% | +2.23% |
TOTR vs. MBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOTR has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than MBS's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOTR vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison
TOTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, less than MBS's 5.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 5.61% | 5.28% | 4.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOTR T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF | 5.31% | 5.14% | 5.32% | 4.71% | 3.45% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOTR and MBS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TOTR has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to MBS (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOTR dropped -19.63% vs MBS's -4.09%.
On 1-year performance, MBS leads with 6.88% vs 5.48% for TOTR. On fees, TOTR is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, MBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MBS has performed better with a 6.88% return vs 5.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOTR is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MBS.
MBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 5.31% for TOTR.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for TOTR and 0.49% for MBS.
MBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOTR and MBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer