PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOTR vs. MBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOTR vs. MBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOTR achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than MBS's 0.62% return.


TOTR

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.27%
1Y
5.48%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
10Y*

MBS

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
0.62%
6M
0.84%
1Y
6.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOTR vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TOTR
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF
0.31%7.41%4.08%
MBS
Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.62%8.13%5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between TOTR and MBS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2024

0.59

The correlation between TOTR and MBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOTR vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOTR
TOTR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
TOTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TOTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

MBS
MBS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOTR vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TOTRMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.14

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.48

9.89

-3.42

TOTR vs. MBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the MBS Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOTR and MBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOTRMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.36

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

1.60

-1.64

Drawdowns

TOTR vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOTR drawdown since its inception was -19.63%, which is greater than MBS's maximum drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOTR and MBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOTRMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.63%

-4.09%

-15.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.56%

-2.20%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-1.46%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-1.02%

-7.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.70%

+0.15%

Volatility

TOTR vs. MBS - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) at 0.90%. This indicates that TOTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOTRMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

0.90%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.70%

2.00%

+0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

2.93%

+1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.22%

3.99%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.22%

3.99%

+2.23%

TOTR vs. MBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOTR has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than MBS's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOTR vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison

TOTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, less than MBS's 5.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MBS
Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
5.61%5.28%4.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TOTR
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF
5.31%5.14%5.32%4.71%3.45%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOTR and MBS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TOTR has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to MBS (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOTR dropped -19.63% vs MBS's -4.09%.

On 1-year performance, MBS leads with 6.88% vs 5.48% for TOTR. On fees, TOTR is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, MBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MBS has performed better with a 6.88% return vs 5.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TOTR is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MBS.

MBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 5.31% for TOTR.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for TOTR and 0.49% for MBS.

MBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOTR and MBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer