PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOTR vs. IGIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOTR vs. IGIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) and iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOTR achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly higher than IGIB's 0.21% return.


TOTR

1D
0.08%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.70%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
4.47%
5Y*
10Y*

IGIB

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.14%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
6.21%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
3.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOTR vs. IGIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TOTR
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF
0.53%7.41%2.43%6.27%-15.88%0.14%
IGIB
iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.21%9.58%3.49%9.22%-14.00%-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between TOTR and IGIB is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021

0.91

The correlation between TOTR and IGIB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOTR vs. IGIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOTR
TOTR Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TOTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TOTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

IGIB
IGIB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IGIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGIB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IGIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGIB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOTR vs. IGIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) and iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TOTRIGIBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

1.52

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

2.26

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.09

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.43

7.08

-0.65

TOTR vs. IGIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the IGIB Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOTR and IGIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOTRIGIBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.52

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.70

-0.73

Drawdowns

TOTR vs. IGIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOTR drawdown since its inception was -19.63%, roughly equal to the maximum IGIB drawdown of -20.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOTR and IGIB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOTRIGIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.63%

-20.62%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.56%

-3.01%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.16%

-6.05%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-1.33%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.01%

-2.58%

-6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

0.89%

-0.05%

Volatility

TOTR vs. IGIB - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) and iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) have volatilities of 1.27% and 1.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOTRIGIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

1.33%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

3.08%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38%

4.14%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.22%

6.56%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.22%

6.06%

+0.16%

TOTR vs. IGIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOTR has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IGIB's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOTR vs. IGIB - Dividend Comparison

TOTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than IGIB's 4.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGIB
iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.82%4.59%4.41%3.78%3.04%2.52%2.74%3.44%3.41%2.51%2.45%2.51%
TOTR
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF
5.30%5.14%5.32%4.71%3.45%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOTR and IGIB have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGIB has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to TOTR (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOTR dropped -19.63% vs IGIB's -20.62%.

On 3-year performance, IGIB leads with 6.21% vs 4.47% for TOTR. On fees, IGIB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IGIB has performed better with a 6.21% return vs 4.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGIB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for TOTR.

TOTR has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 4.82% for IGIB.

TOTR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while IGIB is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for TOTR and 0.06% for IGIB.

IGIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOTR and IGIB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer