TOTL vs. XLE
TOTL (State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOTL is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by State Street, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. TOTL is actively managed, while XLE is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TOTL returned 1.59%/yr vs 9.65%/yr for XLE. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. TOTL charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
TOTL vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOTL achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 22.65% return. Over the past 10 years, TOTL has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 1.59%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.65% annualized return.
TOTL
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- 1.59%
XLE
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -5.83%
- YTD
- 22.65%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- 31.95%
- 3Y*
- 14.78%
- 5Y*
- 18.58%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
TOTL vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOTL State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF | 0.09% | 7.68% | 3.15% | 5.55% | -11.59% | -1.00% | 3.56% | 6.93% | 0.76% | 3.55% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 22.65% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOTL and XLE is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2015 | -0.12 |
The correlation between TOTL and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.08 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOTL vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
TOTL
XLE
TOTL vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF (TOTL) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOTL | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.25 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 2.28 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.68 | 6.62 | -2.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOTL vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOTL drawdown since its inception was -16.48%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOTL and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOTL | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.48% | -71.26% | +54.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -14.05% | +11.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.60% | -20.14% | +13.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.48% | -26.04% | +9.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.48% | -66.81% | +50.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -12.92% | +11.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -17.96% | +14.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 4.84% | -3.75% |
Volatility
TOTL vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF (TOTL) is 1.19%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that TOTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOTL | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 6.85% | -5.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 16.92% | -14.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47% | 20.80% | -17.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.61% | 25.99% | -20.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.79% | 29.59% | -24.80% |
TOTL vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOTL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOTL vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
TOTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than XLE's 2.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOTL State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF | 5.27% | 5.23% | 5.35% | 4.85% | 4.68% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 3.31% | 3.41% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 2.67% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.81% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOTL and XLE have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to TOTL (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOTL dropped -16.48% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 9.65% vs 1.59% for TOTL. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TOTL has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 9.65% return vs 1.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TOTL.
TOTL has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 2.81% for XLE.
TOTL is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while XLE is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TOTL and 0.08% for XLE.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOTL and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer