PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOLZ vs. UPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOLZ vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 22.44% return. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ has underperformed UPRO with an annualized return of 7.84%, while UPRO has yielded a comparatively higher 30.75% annualized return.


TOLZ

1D
0.45%
1M
-3.18%
YTD
11.11%
6M
12.03%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
14.79%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
7.84%

UPRO

1D
-0.97%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
22.44%
6M
20.56%
1Y
74.57%
3Y*
48.38%
5Y*
21.85%
10Y*
30.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOLZ vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
11.11%14.76%11.67%6.18%-4.25%20.47%-9.46%26.84%-7.90%13.28%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
22.44%31.88%63.57%68.53%-56.84%98.64%10.09%102.30%-25.11%71.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TOLZ and UPRO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2014

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between TOLZ and UPRO has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TOLZ vs. UPRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TOLZ
UPRO

Energy

36.0%
3.1%

Utilities

22.2%
2.1%

Real Estate

7.9%
1.8%

Industrials

5.1%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.5%

Financial Services

1.9%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%
9.9%

Technology

0.4%
39.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Energy

TOLZ
36.0%
UPRO
3.1%

Utilities

TOLZ
22.2%
UPRO
2.1%

Real Estate

TOLZ
7.9%
UPRO
1.8%

Industrials

TOLZ
5.1%
UPRO
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

TOLZ
4.4%
UPRO
4.5%

Financial Services

TOLZ
1.9%
UPRO
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

TOLZ
0.8%
UPRO
9.9%

Technology

TOLZ
0.4%
UPRO
39.1%

Basic Materials

TOLZ

-

UPRO
1.7%

Communication Services

TOLZ

-

UPRO
10.6%

Healthcare

TOLZ

-

UPRO
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOLZ vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOLZ
TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

UPRO
UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOLZ vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TOLZUPRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.33

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.80

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.12

11.45

-2.33

TOLZ vs. UPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOLZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the UPRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOLZ and UPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TOLZ vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum UPRO drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and UPRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOLZUPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.33%

-76.82%

+37.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-26.78%

+21.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.94%

-48.87%

+36.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.85%

-63.94%

+42.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

-76.82%

+37.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-6.26%

+2.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-14.39%

+7.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

6.53%

-4.75%

Volatility

TOLZ vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is 3.17%, while ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that TOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOLZUPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

14.03%

-10.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

29.21%

-20.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

37.15%

-26.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

50.59%

-36.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.26%

53.89%

-37.63%

TOLZ vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOLZ vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison

TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than UPRO's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
3.67%3.99%3.53%3.34%3.01%3.28%3.16%2.96%3.63%3.30%2.62%3.67%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
0.71%0.84%0.93%0.74%0.52%0.06%0.11%0.41%0.63%0.00%0.12%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOLZ and UPRO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPRO has higher volatility (14.03%) compared to TOLZ (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs UPRO's -76.82%.

On 10-year performance, UPRO leads with 30.75% vs 7.84% for TOLZ. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 30.75% return vs 7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for UPRO.

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.71% for UPRO.

TOLZ is categorized as Industrials Equities, while UPRO is Leveraged Equities. TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while UPRO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.89% for UPRO.

UPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOLZ and UPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer