TOLZ vs. UPGR
TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) and UPGR (Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds - TOLZ tracks the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index while UPGR tracks the Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TOLZ returned 14.11%/yr vs -0.42%/yr for UPGR. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TOLZ charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for UPGR.
Performance
TOLZ vs. UPGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than UPGR's 0.49% return.
TOLZ
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 15.76%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.71%
UPGR
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- 6M
- -8.21%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 28.76%
- 3Y*
- -0.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.85M | $1.54M | $1.36M | |
| $4.45K | $12.30K | $33.82K |
TOLZ vs. UPGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 12.26% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 2.37% |
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 0.49% | 35.25% | -14.72% | -15.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOLZ and UPGR is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TOLZ and UPGR has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TOLZ vs. UPGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOLZ
UPGR
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Energy
TOLZ
UPGR
Utilities
TOLZ
UPGR
Real Estate
TOLZ
UPGR
-
Industrials
TOLZ
UPGR
Consumer Defensive
TOLZ
UPGR
Financial Services
TOLZ
UPGR
Consumer Cyclical
TOLZ
UPGR
Technology
TOLZ
UPGR
Basic Materials
TOLZ
-
UPGR
Communication Services
TOLZ
-
UPGR
-
Healthcare
TOLZ
-
UPGR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOLZ vs. UPGR — Risk / Return Rank
TOLZ
UPGR
TOLZ vs. UPGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOLZ | UPGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.15 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 1.13 | +2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.87 | 3.00 | +5.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOLZ vs. UPGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum UPGR drawdown of -46.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and UPGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOLZ | UPGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -46.60% | +7.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -22.71% | +17.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.26% | -43.58% | +34.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.30% | -19.78% | +17.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -20.11% | +13.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 8.51% | -6.65% |
Volatility
TOLZ vs. UPGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is 3.58%, while Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) has a volatility of 10.88%. This indicates that TOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOLZ | UPGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 10.88% | -7.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.79% | 24.18% | -15.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.70% | 32.98% | -22.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 31.08% | -17.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 31.08% | -14.85% |
TOLZ vs. UPGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than UPGR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOLZ vs. UPGR - Dividend Comparison
TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than UPGR's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.97% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.39% | 1.16% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOLZ and UPGR have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UPGR has higher volatility (10.88%) compared to TOLZ (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs UPGR's -46.60%.
On 3-year performance, TOLZ leads with 14.11% vs -0.42% for UPGR. On fees, UPGR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TOLZ has performed better with a 14.11% return vs -0.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UPGR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.32% for UPGR.
TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while UPGR tracks Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.35% for UPGR.
TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOLZ and UPGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer