PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOLZ vs. FUTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOLZ vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than FUTY's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ has underperformed FUTY with an annualized return of 7.38%, while FUTY has yielded a comparatively higher 9.03% annualized return.


TOLZ

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.70%
6M
12.93%
YTD
12.39%
1Y
17.08%
3Y*
14.29%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
7.38%

FUTY

1D
0.60%
1M
2.44%
6M
7.57%
YTD
7.43%
1Y
13.16%
3Y*
14.58%
5Y*
10.08%
10Y*
9.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOLZ vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
12.39%14.76%11.67%6.18%-4.25%20.47%-9.46%26.84%-7.90%13.28%
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
7.43%16.40%23.20%-7.46%1.12%17.53%-0.80%24.89%4.36%12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TOLZ and FUTY is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2014

0.61

The correlation between TOLZ and FUTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TOLZ vs. FUTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TOLZ
FUTY

Energy

35.2%
0.5%

Utilities

24.2%
99.3%

Real Estate

7.2%

-

Industrials

5.5%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Financial Services

2.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%

-

Technology

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Energy

TOLZ
35.2%
FUTY
0.5%

Utilities

TOLZ
24.2%
FUTY
99.3%

Real Estate

TOLZ
7.2%
FUTY

-

Industrials

TOLZ
5.5%
FUTY
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

TOLZ
4.4%
FUTY

-

Financial Services

TOLZ
2.0%
FUTY

-

Consumer Cyclical

TOLZ
0.8%
FUTY

-

Technology

TOLZ
0.4%
FUTY

-

Basic Materials

TOLZ

-

FUTY

-

Communication Services

TOLZ

-

FUTY

-

Healthcare

TOLZ

-

FUTY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOLZ vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOLZ
TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FUTY
FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOLZ vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TOLZFUTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.16

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

1.46

+1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

3.07

+6.07

TOLZ vs. FUTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOLZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the FUTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOLZ and FUTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TOLZ vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, which is greater than FUTY's maximum drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and FUTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOLZFUTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.33%

-36.44%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-8.93%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.94%

-17.35%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.85%

-25.11%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

-36.44%

-2.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-3.45%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-6.02%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

4.24%

-2.41%

Volatility

TOLZ vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is 3.68%, while Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that TOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOLZFUTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

4.28%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.67%

11.66%

-2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

14.66%

-4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.02%

17.09%

-3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

19.07%

-2.85%

TOLZ vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTY's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOLZ vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison

TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than FUTY's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
2.58%2.67%2.96%3.31%2.72%2.70%3.07%2.82%3.11%3.03%3.35%4.33%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
2.97%3.99%3.53%3.34%3.01%3.28%3.16%2.96%3.63%3.30%2.62%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOLZ and FUTY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUTY has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to TOLZ (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs FUTY's -36.44%.

On 10-year performance, FUTY leads with 9.03% vs 7.38% for TOLZ. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FUTY has performed better with a 9.03% return vs 7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 2.58% for FUTY.

TOLZ is categorized as Industrials Equities, while FUTY is Utilities Equities. TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.08% for FUTY.

TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOLZ and FUTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer