PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOLZ vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOLZ vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 23.56% return. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 7.93%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 25.28% annualized return.


TOLZ

1D
0.88%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
12.09%
6M
12.14%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
15.12%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
7.93%

FTEC

1D
-3.70%
1M
0.35%
YTD
23.56%
6M
21.69%
1Y
47.58%
3Y*
30.58%
5Y*
19.77%
10Y*
25.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOLZ vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
12.09%14.76%11.67%6.18%-4.25%20.47%-9.46%26.84%-7.90%13.28%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
23.56%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TOLZ and FTEC is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2014

0.44

The correlation between TOLZ and FTEC shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TOLZ vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TOLZ
FTEC

Energy

36.0%
0.3%

Utilities

22.2%

-

Real Estate

7.9%

-

Industrials

5.1%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Financial Services

1.9%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%
0.0%

Technology

0.4%
98.3%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Energy

TOLZ
36.0%
FTEC
0.3%

Utilities

TOLZ
22.2%
FTEC

-

Real Estate

TOLZ
7.9%
FTEC

-

Industrials

TOLZ
5.1%
FTEC
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

TOLZ
4.4%
FTEC

-

Financial Services

TOLZ
1.9%
FTEC
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

TOLZ
0.8%
FTEC
0.0%

Technology

TOLZ
0.4%
FTEC
98.3%

Basic Materials

TOLZ

-

FTEC
0.0%

Communication Services

TOLZ

-

FTEC
0.0%

Healthcare

TOLZ

-

FTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOLZ vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOLZ
TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOLZ vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TOLZFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.94

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

9.03

+0.13

TOLZ vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOLZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOLZ and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TOLZ vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOLZFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.33%

-34.95%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-16.26%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.94%

-27.30%

+15.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.85%

-34.95%

+13.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

-34.95%

-4.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-7.72%

+5.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-5.57%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

5.28%

-3.49%

Volatility

TOLZ vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is 3.24%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 11.42%. This indicates that TOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOLZFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

11.42%

-8.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.30%

18.65%

-10.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.41%

22.79%

-12.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

25.60%

-11.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

24.86%

-8.63%

TOLZ vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOLZ vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than FTEC's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.36%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
3.63%3.99%3.53%3.34%3.01%3.28%3.16%2.96%3.63%3.30%2.62%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOLZ and FTEC have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTEC has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to TOLZ (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 25.28% vs 7.93% for TOLZ. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 25.28% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.36% for FTEC.

TOLZ is categorized as Industrials Equities, while FTEC is Technology Equities. TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.08% for FTEC.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOLZ and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer