PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOK vs. KOKU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOK vs. KOKU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with TOK at 9.75% and KOKU at 9.75%.


TOK

1D
-0.80%
1M
4.53%
YTD
9.75%
6M
10.43%
1Y
25.70%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
13.60%

KOKU

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.64%
YTD
9.75%
6M
10.50%
1Y
25.43%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOK vs. KOKU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
9.75%20.83%19.52%24.76%-17.93%23.84%40.63%
KOKU
Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF
9.75%21.45%19.45%24.23%-17.83%23.84%40.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TOK and KOKU is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2020

0.95

The correlation between TOK and KOKU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

TOK vs. KOKU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TOK
KOKU

Technology

31.3%
28.9%

Financial Services

14.9%
15.6%

Industrials

9.8%
10.5%

Communication Services

9.0%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
9.1%

Healthcare

8.7%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
5.4%

Energy

4.0%
4.4%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.3%

Utilities

2.8%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.8%

Technology

TOK
31.3%
KOKU
28.9%

Financial Services

TOK
14.9%
KOKU
15.6%

Industrials

TOK
9.8%
KOKU
10.5%

Communication Services

TOK
9.0%
KOKU
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

TOK
9.0%
KOKU
9.1%

Healthcare

TOK
8.7%
KOKU
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

TOK
5.2%
KOKU
5.4%

Energy

TOK
4.0%
KOKU
4.4%

Basic Materials

TOK
3.2%
KOKU
3.3%

Utilities

TOK
2.8%
KOKU
2.8%

Real Estate

TOK
1.7%
KOKU
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOK vs. KOKU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOK
TOK Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOK Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOK Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

KOKU
KOKU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
KOKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOKU Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
KOKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOKU Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOK vs. KOKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TOKKOKUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.82

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.07

12.73

+0.35

TOK vs. KOKU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOK Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the KOKU Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOK and KOKU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOKKOKUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.10

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.75

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

1.10

-0.66

Drawdowns

TOK vs. KOKU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOK drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, which is greater than KOKU's maximum drawdown of -25.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOK and KOKU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOKKOKUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-25.77%

-30.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.07%

-9.04%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.23%

-17.73%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

-25.77%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.76%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.52%

-4.82%

-3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.00%

-0.03%

Volatility

TOK vs. KOKU - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) have volatilities of 3.23% and 3.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOKKOKUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

3.35%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

9.42%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.94%

12.18%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

16.41%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

16.81%

+0.34%

TOK vs. KOKU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than KOKU's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TOK vs. KOKU - Dividend Comparison

TOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than KOKU's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KOKU
Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF
1.36%1.48%1.63%1.76%1.98%1.89%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
1.25%1.37%1.66%1.95%3.55%1.66%1.52%2.12%2.74%2.60%2.56%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, TOK and KOKU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KOKU has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to TOK (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOK dropped -56.18% vs KOKU's -25.77%.

On 5-year performance, KOKU leads with 12.19% vs 12.18% for TOK. On fees, KOKU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, TOK has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KOKU has performed better with a 12.19% return vs 12.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KOKU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TOK.

KOKU has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.25% for TOK.

TOK tracks MSCI Kokusai Index, while KOKU tracks MSCI Kokusai Index (World ex Japan). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TOK and 0.09% for KOKU.

TOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOK and KOKU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer