TOK vs. GARY
TOK (iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. TOK is passively managed, while GARY is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TOK charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.
Performance
TOK vs. GARY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOK achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 25.28% return.
TOK
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 23.58%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 13.19%
GARY
- 1D
- -4.30%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 25.28%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOK vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TOK iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF | 7.65% | -0.18% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 25.28% | 0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOK and GARY is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOK vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank
TOK
GARY
TOK vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOK | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOK | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 3.28 | -2.86 |
Drawdowns
TOK vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOK drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOK and GARY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOK | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.18% | -10.28% | -45.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -4.86% | +2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.52% | -1.70% | -6.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | — | — |
Volatility
TOK vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOK | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.22% | 20.25% | -8.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 20.25% | -4.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 20.25% | -3.09% |
TOK vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOK vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison
TOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOK iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF | 1.28% | 1.37% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 3.55% | 1.66% | 1.52% | 2.12% | 2.74% | 2.60% | 2.56% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOK and GARY have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.
TOK has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TOK and 0.77% for GARY.
Find the right allocation for TOK and GARY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer