TOGA vs. GSG
TOGA (Tremblant Global ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - TOGA is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Tremblant Advisors, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. TOGA is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. Over the past year, TOGA returned -8.92% vs 34.57% for GSG. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. TOGA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
TOGA vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOGA achieves a -8.17% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 32.35% return.
TOGA
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- 6M
- -9.71%
- YTD
- -8.17%
- 1Y
- -8.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- 3.60%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 28.24%
- YTD
- 32.35%
- 1Y
- 34.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
TOGA vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TOGA Tremblant Global ETF | -8.17% | 14.13% | 17.44% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 32.35% | 5.93% | -0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOGA and GSG is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2024 | -0.03 |
The correlation between TOGA and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOGA vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
TOGA
GSG
TOGA vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOGA | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.27 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 1.85 | -2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.66 | 6.29 | -6.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOGA vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOGA drawdown since its inception was -28.50%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOGA and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOGA | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.50% | -89.62% | +61.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.50% | -18.81% | -9.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.87% | -60.04% | +46.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.90% | -63.69% | +56.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.62% | 5.51% | +8.11% |
Volatility
TOGA vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) is 6.91%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that TOGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOGA | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 7.35% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.63% | 21.50% | -3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.38% | 23.48% | -2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 22.80% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 22.00% | -0.89% |
TOGA vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOGA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOGA vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
Neither TOGA nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TOGA and GSG have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSG has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to TOGA (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOGA dropped -28.50% vs GSG's -89.62%.
On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 34.57% vs -8.92% for TOGA. On fees, TOGA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, TOGA has been the lower-risk option at 6.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 34.57% return vs -8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOGA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.
TOGA and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TOGA is categorized as Global Equities, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Tremblant Advisors and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TOGA and 0.75% for GSG.
GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOGA and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer