TOGA vs. FWD

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TOGA (Tremblant Global ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TOGA returned -8.92% vs 49.93% for FWD. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TOGA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.

Performance

TOGA vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOGA achieves a -8.17% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 27.74% return.

TOGA

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 6.18%
• 6M: -9.71%
• YTD: -8.17%
• 1Y: -8.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FWD

• 1D: -3.47%
• 1M: -4.98%
• 6M: 18.54%
• YTD: 27.74%
• 1Y: 49.93%
• 3Y*: 32.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOGA vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TOGA Tremblant Global ETF	-8.17%	14.13%	17.44%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	27.74%	32.00%	15.80%

Correlation

The correlation between TOGA and FWD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2024	0.57

The correlation between TOGA and FWD shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TOGA vs. FWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TOGA	FWD
Technology	32.9%	59.8%
Communication Services	30.0%	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	25.7%	3.6%
Financial Services	5.2%	0.5%
Real Estate	3.1%	0.7%
Industrials	1.9%	19.3%
Basic Materials	-	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.8%
Energy	-	2.6%
Healthcare	-	6.9%
Utilities	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

TOGA vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOGA

TOGA Risk / Return Rank: 6
TOGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
TOGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
TOGA Omega Ratio Rank: 5
TOGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TOGA Martin Ratio Rank: 6

FWD

FWD Risk / Return Rank: 72
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOGA vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TOGA	FWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.42	1.78	-2.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.44	2.28	-2.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.30	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	3.85	-4.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.66	12.20	-12.85

TOGA vs. FWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOGA Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the FWD Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOGA and FWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TOGA vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOGA drawdown since its inception was -28.50%, roughly equal to the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOGA and FWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOGA	FWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.50%	-29.02%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.50%	-13.03%	-15.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.87%	-10.39%	-3.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.90%	-4.09%	-2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.62%	4.10%	+9.52%

Volatility

TOGA vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) is 6.91%, while AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a volatility of 13.28%. This indicates that TOGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOGA	FWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.91%	13.28%	-6.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.63%	23.51%	-5.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.38%	28.18%	-6.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.11%	25.73%	-4.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.11%	25.73%	-4.62%

TOGA vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOGA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOGA vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

TOGA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	0.09%	0.11%	1.89%
TOGA Tremblant Global ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOGA and FWD in my portfolio?

TOGA and FWD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TOGA or FWD?

FWD has higher volatility (13.28%) compared to TOGA (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOGA dropped -28.50% vs FWD's -29.02%.

Which ETF is better, TOGA or FWD?

On 1-year performance, FWD leads with 49.93% vs -8.92% for TOGA. On fees, FWD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, TOGA has been the lower-risk option at 6.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TOGA or FWD?

Over the 1-year period, FWD has performed better with a 49.93% return vs -8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOGA or FWD?

FWD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TOGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOGA or FWD?

FWD has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for TOGA.

What is the main difference between TOGA and FWD?

They also come from different issuers: Tremblant Advisors and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TOGA and 0.65% for FWD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.