TOGA vs. ACWV

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

TOGA (Tremblant Global ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Global Equities funds. TOGA is actively managed, while ACWV is passively managed. Over the past year, TOGA returned -7.82% vs 3.41% for ACWV. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TOGA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.

Performance

TOGA vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOGA achieves a -7.11% return, which is significantly lower than ACWV's 2.47% return.

TOGA

• 1D: 2.41%
• 1M: 2.70%
• 6M: -7.11%
• YTD: -7.11%
• 1Y: -7.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACWV

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -0.42%
• 6M: 2.47%
• YTD: 2.47%
• 1Y: 3.41%
• 3Y*: 9.62%
• 5Y*: 5.36%
• 10Y*: 6.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOGA vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TOGA Tremblant Global ETF	-7.11%	14.13%	17.44%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	2.47%	11.04%	8.61%

Correlation

The correlation between TOGA and ACWV is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2024	0.46

TOGA vs. ACWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TOGA	ACWV
Consumer Cyclical	29.8%	5.1%
Communication Services	28.6%	11.9%
Technology	26.7%	25.8%
Financial Services	9.8%	13.2%
Real Estate	2.9%	0.6%
Industrials	2.2%	8.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	9.8%
Energy	-	3.7%
Healthcare	-	13.0%
Utilities	-	7.3%

Return for Risk

TOGA vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOGA

TOGA Risk / Return Rank: 6
TOGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
TOGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
TOGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6
TOGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
TOGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 15
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 14
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOGA vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TOGA	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.37	0.43	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.37	0.66	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.08	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	0.54	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.58	1.54	-2.12

TOGA vs. ACWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOGA Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOGA and ACWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TOGA vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOGA drawdown since its inception was -28.50%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWV drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOGA and ACWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOGA	ACWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.50%	-28.82%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.50%	-6.37%	-22.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.87%	-2.81%	-10.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.81%	-3.11%	-3.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.44%	2.22%	+11.22%

Volatility

TOGA vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison

Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) has a higher volatility of 7.91% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 3.18%. This indicates that TOGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOGA	ACWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.91%	3.18%	+4.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.64%	6.14%	+11.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.26%	8.02%	+13.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.17%	10.27%	+10.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.17%	12.29%	+8.88%

TOGA vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOGA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOGA vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

TOGA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	1.96%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
TOGA Tremblant Global ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOGA and ACWV in my portfolio?

TOGA and ACWV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TOGA or ACWV?

TOGA has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to ACWV (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOGA dropped -28.50% vs ACWV's -28.82%.

Which ETF is better, TOGA or ACWV?

On 1-year performance, ACWV leads with 3.41% vs -7.82% for TOGA. On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TOGA or ACWV?

Over the 1-year period, ACWV has performed better with a 3.41% return vs -7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOGA or ACWV?

ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TOGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOGA or ACWV?

ACWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.00% for TOGA.

What is the main difference between TOGA and ACWV?

They also come from different issuers: Tremblant Advisors and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TOGA and 0.20% for ACWV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.