PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOCQX vs. FZALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOCQX vs. FZALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tocqueville Fund (TOCQX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOCQX achieves a 16.98% return, which is significantly higher than FZALX's 8.03% return. Over the past 10 years, TOCQX has underperformed FZALX with an annualized return of 14.78%, while FZALX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.93% annualized return.


TOCQX

1D
-1.07%
1M
-3.42%
YTD
16.98%
6M
14.43%
1Y
38.05%
3Y*
23.37%
5Y*
14.41%
10Y*
14.78%

FZALX

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
8.03%
6M
7.16%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
24.73%
5Y*
15.94%
10Y*
16.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOCQX vs. FZALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TOCQX
Tocqueville Fund
16.98%22.96%20.70%16.82%-13.72%25.81%12.58%29.34%-7.23%20.38%
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
8.03%27.07%26.13%26.63%-8.89%26.44%13.06%31.25%-7.31%18.01%

Correlation

The correlation between TOCQX and FZALX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013

0.91

The correlation between TOCQX and FZALX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOCQX vs. FZALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOCQX
TOCQX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TOCQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOCQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOCQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TOCQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOCQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FZALX
FZALX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FZALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZALX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FZALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOCQX vs. FZALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tocqueville Fund (TOCQX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TOCQXFZALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

2.84

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.23

12.52

+2.71

TOCQX vs. FZALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOCQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the FZALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOCQX and FZALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TOCQX vs. FZALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOCQX drawdown since its inception was -54.34%, which is greater than FZALX's maximum drawdown of -35.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOCQX and FZALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOCQXFZALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.34%

-35.23%

-19.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-8.99%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.80%

-18.49%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.26%

-23.25%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.13%

-35.23%

+0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.54%

-2.59%

-2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-3.77%

-3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.03%

+0.45%

Volatility

TOCQX vs. FZALX - Volatility Comparison

Tocqueville Fund (TOCQX) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) at 4.53%. This indicates that TOCQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOCQXFZALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.77%

4.53%

+4.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.53%

9.70%

+5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.52%

12.59%

+5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.95%

16.77%

+1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

18.12%

+0.30%

TOCQX vs. FZALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOCQX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FZALX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOCQX vs. FZALX - Dividend Comparison

TOCQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than FZALX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
3.74%4.04%2.83%2.17%4.51%4.92%8.14%13.19%21.94%16.56%2.12%4.33%
TOCQX
Tocqueville Fund
5.79%6.77%8.65%5.91%5.05%10.71%3.38%7.10%9.39%9.73%5.66%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOCQX and FZALX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TOCQX has higher volatility (8.77%) compared to FZALX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOCQX dropped -54.34% vs FZALX's -35.23%.

TOCQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOCQX and FZALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer