TOAK vs. GSUI
TOAK (Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF) and GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOAK is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Twin Oak, while GSUI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate. TOAK is actively managed, while GSUI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. TOAK charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for GSUI.
Performance
TOAK vs. GSUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOAK achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than GSUI's -39.93% return.
TOAK
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 3.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSUI
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -12.82%
- YTD
- -39.93%
- 6M
- -46.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOAK vs. GSUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF | 1.32% | 0.39% |
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | -39.93% | -34.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOAK and GSUI is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOAK vs. GSUI — Risk / Return Rank
TOAK
GSUI
TOAK vs. GSUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) and Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOAK | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.11 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOAK | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.82 | -0.78 | +2.60 |
Drawdowns
TOAK vs. GSUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOAK drawdown since its inception was -1.81%, smaller than the maximum GSUI drawdown of -60.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOAK and GSUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOAK | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.81% | -60.73% | +58.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -60.73% | +59.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -43.81% | +43.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.46% | — | — |
Volatility
TOAK vs. GSUI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOAK | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92% | 107.79% | -104.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.22% | 107.79% | -105.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.22% | 107.79% | -105.57% |
TOAK vs. GSUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOAK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GSUI's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TOAK vs. GSUI - Dividend Comparison
Neither TOAK nor GSUI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TOAK and GSUI have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TOAK.
TOAK and GSUI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TOAK is categorized as Multistrategy, while GSUI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TOAK and 0.00% for GSUI.
Find the right allocation for TOAK and GSUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer