TOAK vs. BDCZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TOAK (Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF) and BDCZ (ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - TOAK is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Twin Oak, while BDCZ is a Financials Equities fund tracking the BDCZ-US - MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. TOAK is actively managed, while BDCZ is passively managed. Over the past year, TOAK returned 3.70% vs -10.32% for BDCZ. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. TOAK charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BDCZ.

Performance

TOAK vs. BDCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) and ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOAK achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than BDCZ's -7.98% return.

TOAK

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: 3.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDCZ

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -7.44%
• YTD: -7.98%
• 6M: -8.99%
• 1Y: -10.32%
• 3Y*: 4.75%
• 5Y*: 3.38%
• 10Y*: 6.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOAK vs. BDCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF	1.32%	4.28%	1.51%
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN	-7.98%	-3.72%	7.32%

Correlation

The correlation between TOAK and BDCZ is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024	-0.04

Return for Risk

TOAK vs. BDCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOAK

TOAK Risk / Return Rank: 52
TOAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
TOAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
TOAK Omega Ratio Rank: 96
TOAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
TOAK Martin Ratio Rank: 49

BDCZ

BDCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4
BDCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BDCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BDCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BDCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BDCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOAK vs. BDCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) and ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TOAK	BDCZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	-0.51	+1.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	-0.59	+2.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.77	0.93	+0.85
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	-0.52	+2.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.11	-0.95	+9.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TOAK vs. BDCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOAK Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the BDCZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOAK and BDCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TOAK	BDCZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	-0.51	+1.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.82	0.27	+1.55

Drawdowns

TOAK vs. BDCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOAK drawdown since its inception was -1.81%, smaller than the maximum BDCZ drawdown of -55.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOAK and BDCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOAK	BDCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.81%	-55.63%	+53.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.81%	-19.95%	+18.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-55.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.72%	-17.27%	+15.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-7.86%	+7.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.46%	10.94%	-10.48%

Volatility

TOAK vs. BDCZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) is 2.72%, while ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) has a volatility of 8.37%. This indicates that TOAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOAK	BDCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.72%	8.37%	-5.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.89%	17.17%	-14.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.92%	20.42%	-17.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.22%	17.80%	-15.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.22%	21.73%	-19.51%

TOAK vs. BDCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOAK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BDCZ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOAK vs. BDCZ - Dividend Comparison

TOAK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.28%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN	11.28%	10.65%	9.26%	9.13%	9.39%	7.49%	10.01%	8.40%	9.66%	8.74%	7.98%
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOAK and BDCZ in my portfolio?

TOAK and BDCZ have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TOAK or BDCZ?

BDCZ has higher volatility (8.37%) compared to TOAK (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOAK dropped -1.81% vs BDCZ's -55.63%.

Which ETF is better, TOAK or BDCZ?

On 1-year performance, TOAK leads with 3.70% vs -10.32% for BDCZ. On fees, TOAK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TOAK has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TOAK or BDCZ?

Over the 1-year period, TOAK has performed better with a 3.70% return vs -10.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOAK or BDCZ?

TOAK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BDCZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOAK or BDCZ?

BDCZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.28%, compared with 0.00% for TOAK.

What is the main difference between TOAK and BDCZ?

TOAK is categorized as Multistrategy, while BDCZ is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TOAK and 0.85% for BDCZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TOAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.