PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNXP vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TNXP vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. (TNXP) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNXP achieves a -27.02% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 278.41% return. Over the past 10 years, TNXP has underperformed MU with an annualized return of -84.70%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 56.13% annualized return.


TNXP

1D
-2.73%
1M
-12.51%
YTD
-27.02%
6M
-35.88%
1Y
-71.82%
3Y*
-87.63%
5Y*
-89.37%
10Y*
-84.70%

MU

1D
1.45%
1M
87.28%
YTD
278.41%
6M
361.42%
1Y
958.34%
3Y*
150.98%
5Y*
67.58%
10Y*
56.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNXP vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNXP
Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp.
-27.02%-52.64%-97.44%-83.46%-96.59%-47.01%-42.31%-94.68%-93.62%-26.61%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
278.41%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TNXP and MU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2012

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TNXP:

$156.26M

MU:

$1.23T

EPS

TNXP:

-$11.15

MU:

$21.26

PS Ratio

TNXP:

6.24

MU:

21.07

PB Ratio

TNXP:

0.69

MU:

16.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

TNXP:

$17.56M

MU:

$58.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TNXP:

$10.28M

MU:

$33.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

TNXP:

-$149.18M

MU:

$25.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNXP vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNXP
TNXP Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TNXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNXP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TNXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNXP Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNXP vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. (TNXP) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TNXPMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-15.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.94

-1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

31.98

-32.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.13

126.47

-127.60

TNXP vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNXP Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 14.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNXP and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TNXPMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

14.69

-15.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.66

1.30

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.60

1.13

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.58

0.31

-0.90

Drawdowns

TNXP vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNXP drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNXP and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNXPMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-98.25%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-81.48%

-30.28%

-51.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.88%

-57.63%

-42.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-100.00%

-57.63%

-42.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

-57.63%

-42.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

0.00%

-100.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.16%

-58.20%

-32.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

63.70%

7.64%

+56.06%

Volatility

TNXP vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. (TNXP) is 25.96%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 28.51%. This indicates that TNXP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNXPMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.96%

28.51%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.37%

53.48%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.75%

66.00%

+22.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

136.01%

52.31%

+83.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

140.91%

49.66%

+91.25%

Dividends

TNXP vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

TNXP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%
TNXP
Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TNXP vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
6.88M
23.86B
(TNXP) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TNXP and MU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (28.51%) compared to TNXP (25.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNXP dropped -100.00% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.69 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNXP and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer