TNUK vs. BKGI
TNUK (Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF) and BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TNUK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKGI.
Performance
TNUK vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNUK achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly lower than BKGI's 13.10% return.
TNUK
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKGI
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 13.10%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 23.46%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TNUK vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TNUK Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 4.10% | 0.02% |
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 13.10% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TNUK and BKGI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TNUK vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank
TNUK
BKGI
TNUK vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF (TNUK) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TNUK | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 1.63 | -1.35 |
Drawdowns
TNUK vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNUK drawdown since its inception was -17.94%, which is greater than BKGI's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNUK and BKGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNUK | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.94% | -14.79% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.08% | -2.37% | -10.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.76% | -2.57% | -5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.88% | — |
Volatility
TNUK vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TNUK | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.07% | 11.60% | +22.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.07% | 14.07% | +20.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.07% | 14.07% | +20.00% |
TNUK vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNUK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TNUK vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison
TNUK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 2.67% | 2.65% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 0.53% |
TNUK Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TNUK and BKGI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKGI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKGI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TNUK.
BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.00% for TNUK.
They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TNUK and 0.65% for BKGI.
Find the right allocation for TNUK and BKGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer