TNUIX vs. MGFIX
TNUIX (1290 Diversified Bond Fund) and MGFIX (AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, TNUIX returned 2.93%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for MGFIX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TNUIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MGFIX.
Performance
TNUIX vs. MGFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNUIX achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly higher than MGFIX's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, TNUIX has outperformed MGFIX with an annualized return of 2.93%, while MGFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.38% annualized return.
TNUIX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 3.16%
- 1Y
- 7.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.75%
- 5Y*
- -1.02%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
MGFIX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- -0.08%
- 10Y*
- 1.38%
TNUIX vs. MGFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNUIX 1290 Diversified Bond Fund | 3.04% | 10.61% | -3.72% | 3.21% | -12.54% | -2.46% | 17.14% | 10.28% | 2.30% | 3.47% |
MGFIX AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund | 0.63% | 7.26% | 1.50% | 6.69% | -13.17% | -9.68% | 7.34% | 11.11% | -1.82% | 6.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between TNUIX and MGFIX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015 | 0.64 |
The correlation between TNUIX and MGFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.81 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TNUIX vs. MGFIX — Risk / Return Rank
TNUIX
MGFIX
TNUIX vs. MGFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 Diversified Bond Fund (TNUIX) and AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund (MGFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TNUIX | MGFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 1.68 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.55 | 4.86 | +1.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TNUIX vs. MGFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNUIX drawdown since its inception was -26.30%, which is greater than MGFIX's maximum drawdown of -25.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNUIX and MGFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNUIX | MGFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.30% | -25.03% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -2.93% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.40% | -6.75% | -7.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.17% | -19.68% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.30% | -25.03% | -1.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.76% | -8.33% | +2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -4.81% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 1.01% | +0.04% |
Volatility
TNUIX vs. MGFIX - Volatility Comparison
1290 Diversified Bond Fund (TNUIX) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund (MGFIX) at 1.15%. This indicates that TNUIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TNUIX | MGFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 1.15% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.11% | 2.78% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.84% | 3.65% | +2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.49% | 5.77% | +3.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.73% | 5.25% | +2.48% |
TNUIX vs. MGFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNUIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MGFIX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
TNUIX vs. MGFIX - Dividend Comparison
TNUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than MGFIX's 4.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGFIX AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund | 4.06% | 3.85% | 3.56% | 2.94% | 2.41% | 2.21% | 3.38% | 4.20% | 3.89% | 3.81% | 4.96% | 4.17% |
TNUIX 1290 Diversified Bond Fund | 3.27% | 7.28% | 6.39% | 3.71% | 3.51% | 4.61% | 2.68% | 8.07% | 3.67% | 2.94% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TNUIX and MGFIX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TNUIX has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to MGFIX (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNUIX dropped -26.30% vs MGFIX's -25.03%.
MGFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TNUIX and MGFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer