MGFIX vs. MEQFX
MGFIX (AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund) and MEQFX (AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund) are both mutual funds - MGFIX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by AMG, while MEQFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, MGFIX returned 1.17%/yr vs 10.64%/yr for MEQFX. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MGFIX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for MEQFX.
Performance
MGFIX vs. MEQFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGFIX achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly higher than MEQFX's -1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, MGFIX has underperformed MEQFX with an annualized return of 1.17%, while MEQFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.64% annualized return.
MGFIX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- -0.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.17%
MEQFX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- 6M
- -4.68%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 1Y
- -8.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
MGFIX vs. MEQFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGFIX AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund | 0.23% | 7.26% | 1.50% | 6.69% | -13.17% | -9.68% | 7.34% | 11.11% | -1.82% | 6.78% |
MEQFX AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund | -1.58% | -2.58% | 24.99% | 19.53% | -9.50% | 43.58% | -4.00% | 16.01% | 8.16% | 15.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGFIX and MEQFX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 1992 | 0.06 |
Over the past year, MGFIX and MEQFX have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGFIX vs. MEQFX — Risk / Return Rank
MGFIX
MEQFX
MGFIX vs. MEQFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund (MGFIX) and AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGFIX | MEQFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.91 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | -0.55 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | -0.97 | +4.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGFIX vs. MEQFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGFIX drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, smaller than the maximum MEQFX drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGFIX and MEQFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGFIX | MEQFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -55.38% | +30.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -17.43% | +14.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.75% | -17.43% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.68% | -19.48% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.03% | -28.69% | +3.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.69% | -13.16% | +4.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -12.19% | +7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 9.94% | -8.90% |
Volatility
MGFIX vs. MEQFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund (MGFIX) is 1.13%, while AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX) has a volatility of 4.41%. This indicates that MGFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEQFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGFIX | MEQFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 4.41% | -3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | 9.71% | -6.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 17.14% | -13.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 17.54% | -11.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.25% | 19.59% | -14.34% |
MGFIX vs. MEQFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGFIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than MEQFX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGFIX vs. MEQFX - Dividend Comparison
MGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, while MEQFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEQFX AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.48% | 0.98% | 2.13% | 27.90% | 0.00% | 9.17% | 3.40% | 30.28% | 5.96% | 11.63% |
MGFIX AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund | 4.11% | 3.85% | 3.56% | 2.94% | 2.41% | 2.21% | 3.38% | 4.20% | 3.89% | 3.81% | 4.96% | 4.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGFIX and MEQFX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MEQFX has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to MGFIX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGFIX dropped -25.03% vs MEQFX's -55.38%.
MGFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGFIX and MEQFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer