QRPNX vs. PASIX
QRPNX (AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N) and PASIX (PACE Alternative Strategies Investments) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 5 years, QRPNX returned 19.47%/yr vs 4.41%/yr for PASIX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QRPNX charges 5.29%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for PASIX.
Performance
QRPNX vs. PASIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QRPNX achieves a 19.06% return, which is significantly higher than PASIX's 3.55% return.
QRPNX
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 19.06%
- 6M
- 20.09%
- 1Y
- 35.78%
- 3Y*
- 23.50%
- 5Y*
- 19.47%
- 10Y*
- —
PASIX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- 1Y
- 8.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- 3.90%
QRPNX vs. PASIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRPNX AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N | 19.06% | 23.09% | 18.64% | 6.94% | 24.83% | 14.04% | -21.20% | -3.25% | -4.58% |
PASIX PACE Alternative Strategies Investments | 3.55% | 7.47% | 6.56% | 4.97% | 0.22% | 2.60% | 9.48% | 6.08% | -5.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between QRPNX and PASIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QRPNX vs. PASIX — Risk / Return Rank
QRPNX
PASIX
QRPNX vs. PASIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N (QRPNX) and PACE Alternative Strategies Investments (PASIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QRPNX | PASIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.02 | 1.95 | +2.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.85 | 2.85 | +3.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 1.40 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.35 | 2.50 | +7.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.91 | 9.87 | +20.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QRPNX | PASIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02 | 1.95 | +2.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.66 | 0.88 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.38 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
QRPNX vs. PASIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRPNX drawdown since its inception was -28.78%, smaller than the maximum PASIX drawdown of -32.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRPNX and PASIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRPNX | PASIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.78% | -32.27% | +3.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.51% | -3.36% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.22% | -4.01% | -7.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.22% | -4.81% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -10.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.38% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -6.32% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 0.85% | +0.37% |
Volatility
QRPNX vs. PASIX - Volatility Comparison
AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N (QRPNX) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to PACE Alternative Strategies Investments (PASIX) at 1.47%. This indicates that QRPNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PASIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QRPNX | PASIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 1.47% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.75% | 3.84% | +2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.21% | 4.49% | +4.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 5.06% | +6.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.32% | 5.04% | +5.28% |
QRPNX vs. PASIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRPNX has a 5.29% expense ratio, which is higher than PASIX's 1.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
QRPNX vs. PASIX - Dividend Comparison
QRPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than PASIX's 10.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PASIX PACE Alternative Strategies Investments | 10.56% | 10.93% | 7.96% | 3.57% | 2.42% | 6.45% | 4.82% | 0.00% | 2.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.14% |
QRPNX AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund Class N | 0.95% | 1.14% | 2.04% | 4.33% | 0.00% | 3.84% | 1.98% | 0.57% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QRPNX and PASIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QRPNX has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to PASIX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRPNX dropped -28.78% vs PASIX's -32.27%.
QRPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.02 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QRPNX and PASIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer