PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNMIX vs. QRPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNMIX vs. QRPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund (TNMIX) and AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund (QRPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNMIX achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly lower than QRPIX's 18.92% return.


TNMIX

1D
0.35%
1M
0.87%
YTD
10.73%
6M
11.11%
1Y
21.14%
3Y*
12.68%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*
4.29%

QRPIX

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.29%
YTD
18.92%
6M
21.21%
1Y
35.36%
3Y*
23.68%
5Y*
19.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNMIX vs. QRPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TNMIX
1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund
10.73%13.48%9.21%5.46%-11.18%3.24%4.52%8.62%-4.36%
QRPIX
AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund
18.92%23.39%18.85%7.23%25.26%14.27%-21.04%-2.98%-4.46%

Correlation

The correlation between TNMIX and QRPIX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018

-0.01

The correlation between TNMIX and QRPIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (5 years) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNMIX vs. QRPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNMIX
TNMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TNMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TNMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

QRPIX
QRPIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
QRPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
QRPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNMIX vs. QRPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund (TNMIX) and AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund (QRPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TNMIXQRPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.71

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.84

10.37

-4.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.10

29.91

-7.80

TNMIX vs. QRPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the QRPIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNMIX and QRPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TNMIXQRPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

3.92

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

1.67

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.85

-0.20

Drawdowns

TNMIX vs. QRPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNMIX drawdown since its inception was -17.21%, smaller than the maximum QRPIX drawdown of -28.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNMIX and QRPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNMIXQRPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.21%

-28.45%

+11.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.63%

-3.48%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.17%

-11.29%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.15%

-11.29%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.18%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-7.64%

+3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.20%

-0.24%

Volatility

TNMIX vs. QRPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund (TNMIX) is 1.63%, while AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund (QRPIX) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that TNMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QRPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNMIXQRPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

2.81%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.16%

6.76%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.39%

9.23%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.65%

11.80%

-4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.12%

10.35%

-3.23%

TNMIX vs. QRPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNMIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QRPIX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNMIX vs. QRPIX - Dividend Comparison

TNMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than QRPIX's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QRPIX
AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund
1.22%1.45%2.24%4.52%0.00%4.08%1.98%0.85%0.09%0.00%0.00%
TNMIX
1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund
1.96%2.18%1.57%3.38%2.86%10.67%0.78%3.06%1.24%0.37%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNMIX and QRPIX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QRPIX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to TNMIX (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNMIX dropped -17.21% vs QRPIX's -28.45%.

QRPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNMIX and QRPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer