PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNHIX vs. PRFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNHIX vs. PRFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1290 High Yield Bond Fund (TNHIX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNHIX achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than PRFRX's 1.96% return. Over the past 10 years, TNHIX has underperformed PRFRX with an annualized return of 4.90%, while PRFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.57% annualized return.


TNHIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.03%
6M
1.63%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
8.13%
5Y*
3.92%
10Y*
4.90%

PRFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.01%
YTD
1.96%
6M
3.36%
1Y
8.88%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
5.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNHIX vs. PRFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNHIX
1290 High Yield Bond Fund
1.03%8.03%8.13%11.51%-9.91%4.08%7.06%12.74%-2.00%5.50%
PRFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
1.96%9.82%11.04%13.78%-1.95%4.60%1.75%8.46%-0.08%3.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TNHIX and PRFRX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2014

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNHIX vs. PRFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNHIX
TNHIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TNHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TNHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

PRFRX
PRFRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PRFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNHIX vs. PRFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 High Yield Bond Fund (TNHIX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TNHIXPRFRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.22

3.32

-1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.49

8.66

-5.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

2.40

-0.93

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

5.92

-2.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.87

22.48

-8.60

TNHIX vs. PRFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is lower than the PRFRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNHIX and PRFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TNHIXPRFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

3.32

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

2.48

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

1.43

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

1.44

-0.74

Drawdowns

TNHIX vs. PRFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNHIX drawdown since its inception was -18.62%, smaller than the maximum PRFRX drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNHIX and PRFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNHIXPRFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.62%

-20.05%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-1.50%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.65%

-2.35%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.52%

-5.94%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.00%

-20.05%

+3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-0.69%

-2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

0.40%

+0.05%

Volatility

TNHIX vs. PRFRX - Volatility Comparison

1290 High Yield Bond Fund (TNHIX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX) have volatilities of 0.84% and 0.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNHIXPRFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

0.81%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.23%

1.91%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82%

2.69%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.23%

2.92%

+1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.58%

3.92%

+0.66%

TNHIX vs. PRFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNHIX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than PRFRX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNHIX vs. PRFRX - Dividend Comparison

TNHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, less than PRFRX's 9.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
9.76%9.99%10.20%9.57%4.03%3.86%4.00%4.84%4.87%4.04%4.07%4.07%
TNHIX
1290 High Yield Bond Fund
6.36%6.29%6.37%5.43%5.44%4.76%5.16%5.51%5.84%3.62%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNHIX and PRFRX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNHIX has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to PRFRX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNHIX dropped -18.62% vs PRFRX's -20.05%.

PRFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNHIX and PRFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer