TNGY vs. XLE
TNGY (Tortoise Energy Fund) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. TNGY is actively managed, while XLE is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TNGY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
TNGY vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNGY achieves a 15.21% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return.
TNGY
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- 32.17%
- 6M
- 29.80%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 20.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
TNGY vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 15.21% | 1.81% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 32.17% | 4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between TNGY and XLE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TNGY vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
TNGY
XLE
TNGY vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TNGY | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.31 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
TNGY vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNGY drawdown since its inception was -8.86%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNGY and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNGY | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -71.26% | +62.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.92% | -6.15% | +2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -17.98% | +15.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.14% | — |
Volatility
TNGY vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TNGY | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.70% | 20.53% | -4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.70% | 26.02% | -10.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.70% | 29.59% | -13.89% |
TNGY vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNGY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
TNGY vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
TNGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than XLE's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 3.41% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.54% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TNGY and XLE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.
TNGY has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 2.54% for XLE.
They also come from different issuers: Tortoise Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TNGY and 0.08% for XLE.
Find the right allocation for TNGY and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer