TNBMX vs. DGFFX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX).

TNBMX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 11, 2017. DGFFX is managed by Destinations Funds. It was launched on Mar 19, 2017.

Performance

TNBMX vs. DGFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TNBMX vs. DGFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TNBMX T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged)	-0.20%	6.87%	3.84%	10.32%	-12.30%	-1.63%	5.73%	10.77%	1.72%	1.35%
DGFFX Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund	0.68%	5.84%	8.04%	7.82%	-6.09%	4.91%	3.59%	6.64%	-0.35%	0.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNBMX achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than DGFFX's 0.68% return.

TNBMX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: -0.20%
• 6M: 1.34%
• 1Y: 6.09%
• 3Y*: 5.79%
• 5Y*: 1.41%
• 10Y*: —

DGFFX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.66%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 1.32%
• 1Y: 5.76%
• 3Y*: 7.00%
• 5Y*: 3.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNBMX vs. DGFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNBMX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than DGFFX's 0.99% expense ratio.

DGFFX

Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund

TNBMX

T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged)

Return for Risk

TNBMX vs. DGFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNBMX

TNBMX Risk / Return Rank: 94
TNBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
TNBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
TNBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
TNBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
TNBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

DGFFX

DGFFX Risk / Return Rank: 84
DGFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
DGFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
DGFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
DGFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
DGFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNBMX vs. DGFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TNBMX	DGFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.22	+0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	2.69	+0.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.67	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	1.74	+1.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.61	7.61	+5.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TNBMX vs. DGFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNBMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the DGFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNBMX and DGFFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TNBMX	DGFFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.22	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	1.53	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	1.48	-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between TNBMX and DGFFX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TNBMX vs. DGFFX - Dividend Comparison

TNBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, more than DGFFX's 6.20% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TNBMX T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged)	6.71%	6.29%	3.15%	2.85%	10.20%	2.84%	1.90%	4.65%	8.20%	0.64%
DGFFX Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund	6.20%	5.52%	6.81%	4.95%	3.37%	4.14%	4.22%	4.18%	3.79%	2.94%

Drawdowns

TNBMX vs. DGFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNBMX drawdown since its inception was -15.78%, which is greater than DGFFX's maximum drawdown of -12.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNBMX and DGFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TNBMX	DGFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.78%	-12.69%	-3.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.32%	-2.35%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.48%	-8.17%	-7.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.09%	-0.98%	-1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.16%	-1.34%	-1.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.52%	0.77%	-0.25%

Volatility

TNBMX vs. DGFFX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) at 0.78%. This indicates that TNBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TNBMX	DGFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	0.78%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.80%	1.43%	+0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71%	3.31%	-0.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.60%	2.38%	+1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.33%	2.60%	+0.73%